Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Cily of Arden Hilb <br />April 9, 2008 <br />Page 3 of] <br />Construction of 20' ;md 10' noise hllrricrs along the west side ofTH 10 could decrease highway noise <br />levels by 41010 dB(A) and I 105 d13(A). respeelively_ Tbe FHWA criteria to delell11ine ifnoise barriers <br />are feasible is that a 5 dB(A) or greater reduction in noise is achieved. As a result, considerations of noise <br />barriers arcfeasible at the locations west ofTII 10. <br /> <br />When noise barriers arc considered warranted and fC<Jsible, the next step in the decision-making process is <br />to determine whether or not the barrier is l'ell,fwllab/e, or cost-effective for construction. Cost <br />reasonableness is defined by the ratio of construction cost of the noise batTier relative to the reduction in <br />highway noise achieved and number of benefiting residences. To be considered reasonable and remain <br />eligible for trunk highway funding, a noise batTier can not exceed $3250 per dB(A) reduction per <br />residence. The cost-effectiveness for the noise halTiers along the west side ofTH 10 is summarized <br />below: <br /> <br />RL Noise Barrier I - <br />RL Noise Barricr 2 .- <br />RL Noise l3an-icr 2EXT- <br /> <br />20'_J1<!fIi.~r <br />$5,839/dB(A) <br />$5)97/dB(A) <br />$5,842/d13(/\) <br /> <br />l<LHnrrier <br />$10,875/dl3(/\) <br />$9.494/dl3(A) <br />Not Feasible <br /> <br />Based on the Mn/DOT cost-effectiveness critcrion, the cost to construct noise barriers relative to the noise <br />reduction achieved and the number of benefiting residcnces is not reasol1able and thercfore can not be <br />constructed with trunk highway funding. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br />Based on Mn/DOT's cost panicipatioll policy, the City of Ardcn Hills has two options to consider while <br />reviewing the findings and recommendations oCthe 'I'll 10 Noise IblTier study. First, the City can accept <br />the findings that highway traffic noise at residences along 'Ill 10 will increase only slightly between now <br />and 2030 without thc inSlallatioll of noise barriers. Changes in noise levels would not be noticeable by <br />most people. <br /> <br />Since costs are not considered reasonable relative to the reduction in noise and number of benefiting <br />residences, the noise barriers are not eligible lor trunk highway funding. A second option the City can <br />consider is to fund for the construction of noise barriers. The estimated construction cost for c..'lch of the <br />noise barriers considered is summarized below: <br /> <br />RL Noise Barrier I (870')- <br />RL Noise Barrier 2 (2000') <br />RL Noise Barr 2EXT (1400') --- <br />BKD Noise Barrier (984') <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />2(1.:. Barrit;;[ <br />$26 I .000 <br />$600,000 <br />$420,000 <br />i295.200 <br />$1.576,200 <br /> <br />lJr.!~arrier <br />$130.500 <br />$300,000 <br />$210,000 <br />$147.600 <br />$788,100 <br /> <br />Benefiting <br />R~_$.i~i.GI1ces <br />5 <br />11 <br />10 <br />_-'L_ <br />30 <br /> <br />Estimated eOlls{l11ction cost is b.lscd Oil all averagc unit cost of$15 per square root and is subject to <br />change based Oil material and labor costs. <br />