Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Kristine Giga <br />May 9, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />It is seldom feasible to inspect 100 percent of a building during a pre-demolition survey. Conservative <br />nnit costs and contingencies are typically included in cost estimates for abatement work because of the <br />potential to encounter previously unforeseen items during abatement and demolition. At the Transfer <br />Property, bo1h BI and IHSC concluded that the buildings are fairly open, so 1he potential for hidden <br />material is somewhat minimized. There is concern that asbestos containing material will be discovered <br />below 1he slabs in some of the buildings. RRLD has included a contingency for unseen asbestos and other <br />regulated materials in the fmal cost estimate. <br /> <br /> <br />In summary, based on the available information, the subcontractor's pre-demolition surveys were <br />completed in accordance wi1h industry and regulatory standards. The abatement cost estimate was <br />prepared following standard me1hods, contains what are considered to be appropriate, somewhat <br />conservative, contingencies and appears adequate for its intended purpose. Costs may be reduced through <br />competitive bidding as competition for such projects is typically strong. Efficient project scheduling also <br />may reduce ultimate costs. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br />Barr Engineering Co. <br /> <br />~~~ <br /> <br />P:\Mpls\23 MN\62\2362975 TCAAP Redevelopment Envirorunental Review\FinalDeliverables\TCAAP Survey Eva1.doc <br />