My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-08-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
04-28-08-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 12:26:10 PM
Creation date
5/13/2008 12:25:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Special City Council Worksession Minutes
General - Type
Worksession Minutes
Date
4/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - April 28, 2008 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that recreations for the whole community not just those people that <br />utilized the trails needed to be identified and addressed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes arrived at 5:06 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that in section 9.4.2 the word extensive should be replaced with <br />the word youth. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the study information was included in the section 9.4.1. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the inclusion of the study information. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that the document state that the City wants to do more <br />for the residents and the how should not be as important. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Michelle Olson stated that the Plan contained a best case <br />scenario for the whole City's parks and recreation system and there were no priorities identified. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that it should be stated that there was the items were not listed in <br />order of priority and that priority could change. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the City utilizing road reconstructions wherever possible as a means <br />to improve the trails. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if page 57 section 9.4.3 referred to the trail being over or under. <br /> <br />City Planner Lehnhoff stated that it was referred to as under. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the use of words such as must and should throughout the document. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that the words must and should be replaced with more <br />direction wording. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding Highway 10, County Road 96, Interstates 694 and 3SW and the <br />changes that were coming regarding these roads. <br /> <br />It was the consensuses of the City Council that the document refers to these possible changes but <br />not specify where the impacts will be because the City does not know at this time the exact <br />impacts. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked for clarification regarding riding bikes on the trail systems. <br /> <br />City Planner Lehnhoff stated that bikes were allowed on the trails. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.