Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The proposed rate for Option I is shown in greater detail on Appendix F. <br /> <br />Residelltial Rate Option II <br /> <br />As with Option II for Water, the sewer charges would be based on water usage and the <br />first 10,000 gallons would be included in a proposed meter charge of $70.50 for <br />residential and senior residential users. Usage over 10,000 gallons would be charged at <br />$3.75 per thousand gallons. Commercial user would be charged $3 per thousand gallons. <br />Given our concerns regarding the existing and future cash balances of this fund, rate <br />increases were intentionally shifted from water to sewer charges by offsetting the faster <br />pace of sewer charge increases for the average residential user and the senior user with a <br />slower water charge increase. The utility user views their water and sewer bill in total and <br />we attempted to control the overall increase in the combined bill by shifting the majority <br />of the increases to the Sewer Fund. Option II provides $1,453,900 in total revenues. In <br />some cases, a user would see a decrease in the water portion of their bill, but an increase <br />in the sewer portion of the bill. <br /> <br />The proposed rate for Option II is shown in greater detail on Appendix F. <br /> <br />Residential Rate Optioll III <br /> <br />Rate tier option 1II would impose a charge for all usage. The base charge would then be <br />decreased from the current base charge of $67.83 for residential and $45.20 for seniors to <br />$50 for residential and $25 for seniors. All usage would be charged at $3.50 per thousand <br />gallons. Commercial users would be charged $3.50 per gallon. Option 1II provides <br />$1,432,300 in total revenues. <br /> <br />The proposed rate for Option 1II is shown in greater detail on Appendix F. <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees <br /> <br />The City currently has not instituted a SAC fee. We would recommend that the City <br />study and determine the costs associated with the TCAAP area and adopt applicable <br />rates. As with WAC fees, some cities have chosen to make it a policy decision to recover <br />a targeted percentage of construction costs through SAC fees, which may be paid at the <br />time the permit is pulled or the plat approved. There are differing levels of risk regarding <br />the timing. Collecting WAC and SAC fees when the plat is approved insulates the City <br />against market downturns and places the carrying costs on the developer. <br /> <br />We are also recommending that the City adopt a SAC fee to future in-fill development <br />and business expansion. <br /> <br />Cash Balances <br /> <br />Operating Reserve <br />We recommend the sewer fund carry a minimum cash balance for operations of aJ) <br />amount equal to 50% of operating expenses, excluding depreciation, plus annual debl <br /> <br />12 <br />