My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-08-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
06-09-08-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2008 2:35:41 PM
Creation date
7/3/2008 2:35:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
06-09-08 Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
6/9/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - June 9, 2008 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated that, because the data had not all been analyzed yet, the smoke <br />testing may be able to provide the information that the City needed in order to identify the larger <br />problem areas. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for clarification on the expense of smoke testing and how the <br />summer employee would be utilized. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag stated that he would get the figures from Mr. Janski on Thursday. <br />He also stated that the summer employee would be used to inspect manholes and also to work on <br />the cleaning and televising of sewer lines. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked about the quality of records that were used in the sump pump <br />program. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag stated that the City's Staff has done some follow up with this data <br />and found that the records we have show more compliant properties than non compliant. <br />However, we have only located approximately one-third of the records from the 2000 inspection <br />program. He also stated that staff had done some visual inspections throughout the City and <br />found that there maybe less sump pumps being drained improperly than the staff was led to <br />believe. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for clarification regarding the implementation of the sump pump <br />inspection program. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag stated that the sump pump inspection would be done at the same <br />time as the water meter battery replacements. He also stated that the City would need to look at <br />some ordinance changes over the next few weeks. The timetable is expected to be that during <br />July and August tIle ordinances would be revievved and changed as needed, during September and <br />October Staff would do an ad campaign to let the residents know what would be happening and <br />then doing the inspections and battery replacements in November and December. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked what the cost was for the batteries and if this was a budgeted item. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag stated that the batteries cost $35.00 each and Staff was looking to <br />find a less expensive supplier. He also stated that one third of the total was budgeted each year <br />over the next three years. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung asked for clarification regarding the number of years the City will <br />receive credit from Met council in addressing and fixing the 1&1 issues. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that the City was currently in year two of a five year cycle. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated that the current approach the City is taking is to look at all <br />sources in the entire City with some of the areas substantially worse than others. He asked if Staff <br />had considered a focused approach in one or two areas and looking at each area where 1&1 could <br />be occurring and address those items, then applying this approach to other areas within the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.