Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Master Planning Issues <br /> <br />1. Type and tenure of housing (3 to 4 meetings - August 11 and 20, September 8 <br />and 15) <br />a. Mix of rental vs. owner occupied <br />i. Senior vs. market rate <br />ii. Discussion on pros and cons regarding density and a mix of <br />housing type and tenure <br />b. Massing <br />i. Tour of sites <br />ii. 3-D modeling by City <br />iii. Context of other sites in Metropolitan Area in comparison to <br />TCAAP <br /> <br />c. Location of higher density housing <br />i. Congregate towards open space or spread some out <br /> <br />d. Valuation of for-sale housing <br />i. Market issue <br />ii. Need a blend <br /> <br />e. Affordability - Rental and Owner occupied (SEPARATE MEETING <br />ISSUE, NOT INCLUDED IN 3 TO 4 meetings MENTIONED <br />ABOVE) <br />1. Apartments and Condos <br />1. Definition of affordable rents and related income levels <br />2. Definition of affordable for-sale and related income levels <br /> <br />f. Possible review of tradeoff of more housing for less industrial <br />i. Property tax implications <br />ii. Jobs/housing mix <br /> <br />2. Roadways/Infrastructure (1 to 3 meetings - Sept 17, Oct 13 and 20) <br /> <br />a. Parkway <br /> <br />1. Character <br />1. Should the parkway be a place to drive "through" or a place <br />to drive "to". <br />a. Should the placement of buildings, amenities, and <br />streetscaping along all or a portion of the parkway <br />create a narrower feeling corridor with a "walkable <br />neighborhood" feel, and encourage slower traffic <br />speeds, or should they create a wider, more open <br />feeling corridor with a vehicle-oriented character <br />2. W ant parkway to look attractive as you drive along <br />