My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4E, Order to Remove Hazardous Building & Contents
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-11-08-R
>
4E, Order to Remove Hazardous Building & Contents
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2008 11:14:24 AM
Creation date
8/12/2008 11:13:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Order to Remove Hazardous Building
General - Type
Order to Remove Hazardous Building
Date
8/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 26, 2006 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />decided to put o'n a totally new roof. I set out to find carpenters. I hired two carpenters after <br />receiving an excellent reference for them from the Perkins Restaurant Manager. I then went to <br />the Arden Hills Village office, requested and received a building permit to put on a new roof <br />The carpenters then went to the Village office, requested, and received instructions to put on the <br />roof exactly to the Village requirements. The carpenters spent 3 days putting on the new root: <br />and a 4t11 day working on tIle outside of the building. There were no openings, no loose boards, - <br />the building is not sagging, or leaning, even though 4 days were spent on the building, the <br />building inspector did not come out in' all that time, and when I called the Village office for <br />inspection, the inspector came out, but would not go up to look at the roof. He wrote a letter <br />saying that he did not have a way to get on the roof, and he then mailed a new listing of <br />complaints against me that were false. I paid $2,000.00 to the carpenter for their work, which <br />was totally satisfactory to my son and myself. Not until all of the work was completed on the <br />building was I told that the building was unsafe and had to be taken down. It makes no sense to <br />say that the building is unsafe. The carpenters weighed a total of 450 lbs., and spent 3 days on <br />the roof: The neighbor on the south side came to us twice, to assure us that he had not <br />com.plained about the building. I called Lowell Anderson on the north side, and he said <br />"absolutely not" to n1Y qllestion of whether he had a complaint against the building. He then <br />wrote and mailed a letter to Mayor Aplikowski, expressing his feelings of what the Village was <br />doing to me~ Mrs~ Aplikowski can show you that letter~ <br /> <br />My husband has passed away; I'm alone, in poor health, and bedridden mllch of the time. My <br />son Marlin lives 50 miles away, and in the short time that he can be here, he is trying to empty <br />our building. I have said over and over again that when we sell the property, the first thing the <br />new owners will do is to take down the storage building to make way for their new home. There <br />is absolutely no sense in taking that building away from nle~ <br /> <br />There are so many people staying in touch with me about this. I'm in close contact with a well <br />kn.own building inspector from Minneapolis, and with an attorney recommended to me. <br /> <br />Mrs. Martin Stenberg <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated in 2004 the City filed a citation in Criminal Court, which took an inordinate <br />amount of time to resolve. He noted Mrs. Stenberg had pled guilty to tile charges with <br />conditions, but failed to sign the conditions and was therefore appearing before the judge again in <br />the near future. He stated he did not believe the City could have done anything else to work with <br />the property owner. He indicated this had been a six-year process and the property has n.ot been <br />cleaned up during. this time period. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she had looked at the property about a year ago and had requested <br />Mrs. Stenberg remove the. fence, which she had refused to do. She stated she had also offered to <br />remove all of Mrs. Stenberg's personal property and take it to her, which she also refused. She <br />believed this was an unsafe condition and she did not understand why Mrs. Stenberg was so <br />resistant to accepting help. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.