My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-08-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
07-28-08-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2008 2:42:33 PM
Creation date
8/26/2008 2:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
7-28-08 Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
7/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - July 28, 2008 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated that the concern is that the City not be locked <br />into a rate of 15% in case something changes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how the City would be locked In because the <br />resolution is to evaluate the Performas. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that if the 15% is not achieved then the amount of <br />TIP is raised to reach that goal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that this was the point and that the City is agreeing <br />that the developer can get a 150/0 rate ofretum. She also stated that if there are risks <br />that change or if different money comes in a different way the City is still <br />guaranteeing a 150/0 rate ofretum. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that the City does not have to provide any TIF then <br />the deal falls through. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that the Now, Therefore section of the resolution is the <br />direction that the City is giving not Whereas direction and the Now, Therefore <br />section states that the City is evaluating Performas and will consider a 15% <br />maximum benchmark for internal rate of return. <br /> <br />Motion to amend the third Whereas was called to a vote. The motion failed (2-2-1 <br />-Mayor Harpstead and Councilmember Holmes - Councilmember Holden <br />abstained). <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that under the Now, Therefore section, item 1 the <br />last line refers to look back provisions based on future performance. He stated that <br />at the end of the sentence he would like to add the phrase "of land and vertical <br />development" . <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that this was included in item 2 of this section. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that this is specifically excluded [rom the resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Bubul stated that this resolution is related to the land development rate of <br />return and this resolution only refers to the horizontal development. The vertical <br />development will be looked at later. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that as the resolution reads now it IS to the City's <br />advantage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.