My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1D, Organization Structure
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
09-15-08-WS
>
1D, Organization Structure
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2008 3:43:26 PM
Creation date
9/12/2008 3:42:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
1D, Organization Structure
General - Type
1D, Organization Structure
Date
9/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9/12/2008 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />-- The Superintendent is focused on planning, organizing, scheduling and <br />assigning work to enable the crew to operate efficiently and effectively <br /> <br />Cons --The Superintendent is limited in doing maintenance work <br />--The Superintendent is onjob sites less than a working foreman <br /> <br />Option B <br />Pros: <br /> <br />--The Working Foreman can assist with the work of the crew <br />-- The Working Foremen can be on the work site more with the crew <br /> <br />Cons: --A working foreman is not separated from the union, so does not have authority <br />regarding personnel issues <br />--A working foreman is pulled between organizing work and doing work. This <br />can create tension, and can reduce the productivity of the crew if too much time is spent doing <br />vs. organizing work. <br />--A working foreman is generally focused on one or two aspects of maintenance <br />operations, i.e. water, or water and sewer, which does not facilitate priority setting among the <br />multiple maintenance operations, i.e. streets, parks, water, sewer, storm sewer, fleet maintenance. <br />-- With a crew of 8, (with an additional 7 seasonal workers during the busiest <br />portion of the year) and multiple maintenance activities, a single working foreman could not <br />plan, schedule, and organize the work of the crew and still operate as a working foreman. <br />Either the "working" element would suffer, or the "foreman" element would.suffer. <br />--multiple working foremen would be needed to manage the Public Works <br />maintenance operation. Looking ahead to the development of TCAAP, the scope of <br />maintenance operations will increase substantially, as well as the size of the crew, <br />making it more difficult to manage the crew with one or more working foremen. <br />-- With two or more working foremen, the amount of time spent organizing work <br />vs. doing work becomes equivalent to a full-time maintenance position, resulting in a de facto <br />loss of a maintenance position, although there are "working" foremen. <br />--Having multiple working foremen reduces or eliminates the opportunity for <br />maintenance workers to serve as project leaders at work sites <br />--Assigning multiple working foremen to oversee specific operational areas can <br />erode the philosophy of a cohesive group of cross-trained maintenance workers, as the working <br />foremen will be focused on their specific operational areas, and will tend to surround themselves <br />with crew members who have the same focus. <br />-- working foremen focused on one or two operational areas will have a more <br />difficult time coordinating among themselves in terms of priority setting regarding the needs of <br />the various operational areas. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />On the basis of the above analysis, it is recommended that the Public Works maintenance <br />operation be managed by a Public Works Superintendent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.