My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1A, Community Livability
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
10-20-08-WS
>
1A, Community Livability
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2008 11:46:15 AM
Creation date
10/22/2008 11:44:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
1A, Community Livability
General - Type
1A, Community Livability
Date
10/20/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />officer reviews the violation and determines if the fine was warranted or should be <br />dismissed. There are not any statistics readily available on the number of fines that are <br />appealed. <br /> <br />Should a property owner refuse to comply or pay the fine, there is disagreement in the <br />legal community on what occurs next. Some cities have adopted a code that allows them <br />to assess the fine to the property taxes. Based on his initial research, the Arden Hills City <br />Attorney has advised us against adopting a code where the administrative fine could be <br />assessed to property taxes. While the city may be able to recover the fine, the city may <br />still not have compliance. In cases where conlpliance is unattained, a criminal or civil <br />citation is often the only remaining tool. For certain public nuisance violations, a city can <br />abate the property and assess the cost, which is discussed further in the below sections. <br /> <br />City Code: In order to use this process, the City Council would need to adopt the <br />necessary regulations to the City Code and amend the fee schedule to include the fines <br />for violations. The Code would also need to appoint a hearing officer to hear appeals to <br />the administrative fines. <br /> <br />Cost: This process would require involvement from the City Administrator, Community <br />Development Director, City Attorney, Building Official and Code Enforcement Officer. <br />While there is not a standard cost for setting up this type of program, a reasonable <br />estimate is $2,500 to $3,500 for the cost of staff and city attorney time. This process <br />would also require a continual dedication of staff time and resources without a guarantee <br />of cost recovery. <br /> <br />Until. an administrative fine policy is created, it is difficult to estimate the number of fines <br />that would be issued each year and the impact of ongoing costs. However, for a purely <br />hypothetical example, assume that a fine is issued on the second notice and waived if <br />there is compliance within seven days of issuing the fine. If 80 fines are issued, 40 fines <br />are waived due to compliance, 35 fines are paid due to continued noncompliance, and 5 <br />are appealed, the staff time could be at or above 80 additional hours per year (estimate of <br />one hour per fine for admin, preparation, finance, and correspondence time). At a rate of <br />$30/hour, staff time would cost $2,400. Revenue should not exceed the cost of the <br />program but could vary depending on the fine (e.g. the City of Roseville charges $100 <br />per fine). In this example the program would pay for itself in terms of cost; however, it <br />would not be sufficient revenue to hire another full or part time employee. Unless other <br />staff activities are reduced, additional help would likely be needed to administer the <br />program. Since an administrative fine does not guarantee compliance, some fines would <br />likely be converted to civil or criminal citations. <br /> <br />Accelerated Abatement <br /> <br />The current City Code allows for the abatement process for public nuisances; however, it <br />can be a relatively long process for certain types of nuisances that need immediate <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for October 20, 2008 <br /> <br />I IAhdocsl \ahIAHdafa\Planning\Communi~v Developmenf\Commllni~v LivabilifylMemos\l 02008 - CC Memo - Community Livabili~y.doc <br /> <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.