Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - OCTOBER 15, 2008 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant felt that the current design standard screams "this is not <br />Arden Hills." He indicated the streetlights and sidewalks should be kept in <br />however, because this will create a unique environment within TCAAP. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding whether sidewalks and decorative lighting was <br />needed within the residential areas. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead questioned if sidewalks were needed on one side, both or <br />neither sides of the street. He indicated he would not insist that both sides of the <br />street have sidewalks within the residential areas. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated this would depend greatly on the style and price <br />range of the residential homes. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated this may vary on the determined setbacks as <br />well. He stated he was fine with allowing sidewalks on one side of the street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant explained sidewalks should be placed on both sides of the <br />street within this development. <br /> <br />Ms. McJilton stated at a minimum the sidewalks should be placed on one side and <br />that as the housing developers are identified further discussion could be held <br />regarding setbacks and housing styles. She stated a walk-able community was <br />trying to be created and these sidewalks and proposed lighting would greatly <br />contribute. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if the lighting could be fairly spaced out. <br /> <br />Ms. McJilton stated the spacing could be addressed with the housing developers to <br />establish a desired design standard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned who would pay for the decorative street <br />lighting and the electricity. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag explained at this time the City pays for the <br />electricity and that an LED light would be l!l oth the expense of a normal <br />streetlight. <br />