Laserfiche WebLink
<br />How it works for cities: <br /> <br />"The reimbursement" <br /> <br />The MVliC reimbursement is not an aid; it <br />does not represent dollars in addition to what <br />the city has levied. The reimbursement <br />makes up part of a city's levy. Cities do not <br />budget for it. The credit to homeowners <br />reduces a city's property tax receipts by the <br />amount of the credit allocated to the city. <br />This means the city will receive less than its <br />certified tax levy from taxpayers. The state <br />makes up the difference by reimbursing the <br />city for the city portion of the credit received <br />by property OWlllers. The combination of <br />after-credit tax receipts and the MVHC <br />reimbursement should equal the city's <br />certified levy. For most cities, between five <br />and fifteen percent Qfthe city's levy is paid <br />by the state through the MVHC <br />reimbursement. <br /> <br />An example helps to illustrate how the <br />program works. Assume a city certifies a <br />levy of$100. After taxpayers pay their tax <br />bills, $90' is generated for the city. The <br />difference between what is generated from <br />taxpayers ($90) and what the city certified <br />($100) is made up by the MVHC <br />reimbursement ($10). The city must still <br />certify $100 for its levy in order to realize the <br />full $100 from the combination of taxpayer <br />payments and the reimbursement. <br /> <br />The 2003 legislature balanced a major state <br />deficit by cutting state aids and credits to <br />cities. Under the cuts, some cities that receive <br />little or nQ Local Government Aid <br />experienced a reduation in the MVHC <br />reimbursement. The 2005 legislature <br />extended the MVHC reimbursement cuts for <br />103 cities for 2005 and 2006. The funding <br />for the city portion of the MVHC <br />reimbursement was reduced from <br />approximately $82 million to $65 million for <br /> <br />Revised August 2008 <br /> <br />these years. While property owners continued <br />to receive the benefit of the full credit, cities <br />were not reimbursed for the full amount of <br />those credits. These cities therefore did not <br />collect their total certified levy amount. In <br />other words, for these cities, the gap between <br />the certifi,ed levy and what the taxpayers pay <br />was not filled completely (or at all). Ttle <br />MVHC reimbursements were restored for <br />taxes payable in 2007. <br /> <br />Cities receive their market value credit <br />reimbursement in two installments from the <br />state, in October and in December. <br />Information on the amount of each. city's <br />credit is usually available in late summer <br />each year. <br /> <br />MVHC and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) <br />districts <br /> <br />TIF districts are eligible for the market value <br />credit when a property receiving the credit is <br />located within the TIF district. The PQrtiQn <br />of the credit allocated to the TIF district is <br />based on the percentage of the parcel's value <br />that is captured in the TIF district. The <br />market value credits for a TIF district are sent <br />to the city in each December. Cities with TIF <br />districts can determine the amount of the <br />market value credit the districts will receive <br />by consulting the Department of Revenue. <br /> <br />Agricultural Market Value Credit <br />The 2001 legislature also created the <br />Agricultural Market Value Credit program, <br />which reduces the property tax of agricultural <br />homestead property up to $345, based upon a <br />percentage of market value. This credit <br />program, like the MVHC, results in a portion <br />of the city's certified levy paid by the state <br />instead of local taxpayers. Most cities receive <br />very little, if any, of this credit <br />reimbursement. <br />