Laserfiche WebLink
<br />public subsidy. Therefore, any resources <br />expended on TIF are a pure subsidy to <br />developers. The pure attribution theory <br />sees TIF as a necessary incentive to lure <br />businesses to areas that would likely <br />never be developed, at least for a period <br />of several years. Any resources going to <br />TIF are merely investments that will <br />likely payoff handsomely in the future. <br />My research takes a different <br />approach to this topic. Using a proba- <br />bility-based analysis technique called <br />Monte Carlo simulation, I investigated <br />the probabilities of a positive financial <br />outcome fronl TIE By sim.ulating nlY <br />model under various scenarios, I was <br />able to answer the following important <br />questions concerning TIF: <br /> <br />1. What is the likely effect of TIF proj- <br />ects on local government financial <br />conditions? <br />2. Are TIF projects good investments <br />for local governm.ents (Le., are they <br />likely to produce rates of return that <br />justify their use)? <br />3. U.nder what conditions are the best <br />financial results from TIF obtained? <br /> <br />This study was jointly funded by the <br />Minneapolis Planning Department and <br />by a grant froIn CURA's l~aculty Interac- <br />tive Research Program. With this <br />support and with the assistance of a <br />graduate research assistant provided <br />through CURA, I .was able to compile an <br />annotated bibliography of TIF resource <br />materials for use by the Minneapolis <br />Planning Department, collect and <br />analyze property tax records from <br />Hennepin County and the Minneapolis <br />Community Development Agency, and <br />develop a deterministic simulation <br />model that the city of Minneapolis can <br />use to assess the financial effects of <br />proposed TIF projects. <br />This article will provide a brief <br />explanation of how TIF works in theory <br />and practice, describe the nlethodology <br />for the simulation Inodel used to assess <br />the financial effects of TIF projects, <br />discuss the results of this siInulation, <br />and offer conclusions and policy impli- <br />cations stemming fronl this research. <br /> <br />What Is Tax Increment Financing? <br />How TIP Works. 'I'he nature of tax <br />increment financing varies from state to <br />state. In Minnesota, a local government <br /> <br />Cover photo: Calhoun Square, located <br />in the Uptown neighborhood of <br />Minneapolis, was constructed in the <br />1980s using tax increment financing. <br /> <br />2 CURA REPORTER <br /> <br />or its designated redevelopment <br />authority determines that an area of (or a <br />specific property in) the community is <br />econonlically challenged due to some <br />factor or set of factors-although often <br />this determination emerges out of a <br />request by a developer for a subsidy. 'The <br />local government or other redevelop- <br />ment authority then goes through a <br />process to designate a tax increment <br />district (TID) that includes the area <br />targeted for redevelopnlent (in <br />Minnesota there are seven types of <br />districts that can use TIF including rede- <br />velopment districts and mined under- <br />ground space districts). The assessed <br />value of the TID is then "frozen." This <br />means that all future revenues from <br />properties in the TID are split between <br />two different destinations. Future tax <br />revenues derived from the value of the <br />frozen assessed value continue to go to <br />the various local governments as they <br />did before the I'll) was designated. <br />However, taxes derived from increases in <br />the assessed value above that frozen <br />value go to the authority in charge of the <br />TID to pay for development costs (the <br />additional revenue is the tax increment). <br />These development costs can include <br />physical development of propelties as <br />well as disposition of the properties at <br />below market prices, or write-downs. 1 <br />Table 1 and the sidebar on page 4 <br />briefly document the history of the use <br />of TIF in Minnesota. <br />The Economic Impact of TIF. Tax <br />increment financing affects the pattern <br />of both revenue and expenditures for <br />local governments. On the revenue side, <br />Tn~ mostly inlpacts the growth rates of <br />assessed market value for parcels of <br />property in and out of the 'TII), as well <br />as altering the number of properties <br />froln which the local government <br />derives revenue for basic city services. <br />On the expenditure side, the increase in <br />economic wealth in the jurisdiction <br />(reflected in the increase in assessed <br />market value) is likely to cause increases <br />in demand for public goods, thereby <br />raising expenditure demands. <br />In the theoretical model that was <br />developed for this research project, the <br />variables with the most effect on the <br />finances of local government were the <br />following: <br /> <br />.... the pre- and postproject growth rates <br />of properties located inside or <br />outside the tax increment district <br /> <br />1 In SOIne if not most states, TID authorities can <br />issue bonds, the principal and interest on which <br />are repaid from the tax increment. . <br /> <br />.... the probability that the properties in <br />a TIF district would have been devel- <br />oped without the use of TIF <br />.... the elasticity of demand for expendi- <br />tures on local government services <br />with respect to changes in assessed <br />valuation <br />.... the direct operating subsidy provided <br />by the local government to a TIP <br />district <br /> <br />Study Methodology <br />The uncertainty inherent in the deci- <br />sion to use TIF mitigates against the use <br />of simple models to analyze financial <br />effects. It is easy to see that if a property <br />is likely to be developed without the use <br />of TIl~ the revenue effect for the city is <br />negative. The relevant policy question <br />is, What is the amount of the revenue <br />effect, on average? If it is likely that <br />revenue will be greatly reduced through <br />using TIF, cities may want to consider <br />other means of financing projects, or <br />perhaps not offer the projects full local <br />government support. However, if the <br />implementation of TIF will likely cause <br />only a slnallloss of revenue or even <br />revenue gains (through increases in the <br />market value of other properties in the <br />jurisdiction), local governments should <br />seek all possible opportunities to use <br />this redevelopment tool. <br />Three factors make it difficult to <br />predict the fiscal inlpacts of TIE First, <br />little research had been done on the <br />effects of TIP on economic development. <br />'There have been only a handful of <br />attempts to address the question of rela- <br />tive econolnic growth rate and the <br />results of these studies are split, with <br />some finding a positive effect on <br />economic growth and others finding no <br />effect or even a negative effect. Second, it <br />is not possible to objectively determine <br />the probability of future development <br />without TIF before the decision is made to <br />use TIE Finally, it is possible only to <br />estirnate future growth rates of properties <br />and the future elasticity of demand for <br />public services. Therefore, these are <br />sources of uncertainty for potential <br />policy prescriptions regarding TIE <br />In order to address these issues, I <br />used a Monte Carlo simulation. Monte <br />Carlo simulations were first developed <br />in the 1940s during the Manhattan <br />Project and are currently used in fields <br />ranging from quantum physics to <br />finance. The simulations allow an <br />analyst to predict potential future values <br />for a theoretical model by entering a <br />large number of random inputs and <br />then recording outputs generated from <br />