Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: December 1,2008 <br /> <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: Sue Iverson, Finance Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Revised Job Description for Customer Service Representative and <br />Reclassification <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: <br /> <br />In 2007, the City Council authorized a compensation study of non-union positions. During this <br />study, it was found that the Customer Service Representative position did not quite fit into the <br />new scale. After research and discussions with our consultant, Rod Kelsey, it has been <br />determined that this position should be re-classed from Grade 3 to Grade 4 in our compensation <br />system matrix. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />The City currently has two Office Support Specialists (Grade 4) and one Customer Service <br />Representative (Grade 3). All three of these positions are cross-trained in a range of office <br />support and customer service duties, while specializing in areas in which they have a particular <br />interest and expertise. This makes these positions very similar in terms of level of responsibility. <br />The attached revised job description more accurately reflects the functions of the Customer <br />Service Specialist, and is the basis for the reclassification of the Customer Service Specialist <br />position to the same level as the Office Support Specialist position. Staff recommends that these <br />positions be kept separate instead of just combining them into one classification, as the Customer <br />Service Specialist is the primary contact point for the public and this would specify these duties. <br /> <br />In re-classing this position, the same criteria would be uSed to integrate the current incumbent in <br />the Customer Service Representative position into the pay scale as was used for all other <br />employees. (Note: The Customer Service Representative position did not receive an increase in <br />December 2007 and only COLA on January 1, 2008, as the incumbent's then-current salary was <br />outside the new pay range.) This would be a budget impact of$972 for 2008. This concurs with <br />the recommendation of our consultant, Rod Kelsey. <br />