Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Back2round <br /> <br />The current set of shoreland regulations was updated in early 2002 as part of the re-codification <br />of the overall City Code and to address certain requirements in the Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources (DNR) shoreland regulations. While that ordinance update did address some <br />of the technical requirements set by the DNR, there were a number of holes and unaddressed <br />issues remaining after that update. Concurrently, Staff has been faced with a number of <br />questions and concerns expressed by local property owners that are not explicitly addressed in <br />the existing ordinance. These scenarios have introduced the need for greater clarification to the <br />City's shoreland ordinance so that it may be able to promptly address common issues and <br />concerns as they pertain to public waters and wetlands. <br /> <br /> <br />The DNR has started an update process to the statewide shoreland regulations, which is the <br />foundation for shoreland regulations in virtually all cities. Based on conversations with the <br />DNR, the update process is most likely to impact developing communities with undeveloped <br />shoreline and it could still be a number of years before anything is approved by the legislature. <br />The DNR has produced a set of voluntary "alternative" shoreline standards for a five county test <br />area in central Minnesota; however, those standards were geared toward rural communities with <br />undeveloped shoreline. While future changes to the statewide regulations may impact the City's <br />ordinance, Staff recommends moving forward with our update process so that local needs can be <br />addressed. <br /> <br />Identified Shoreland Mana!!ement Ordinance Concerns <br /> <br />As part of this update project, Staffhas identified a number of open issues and questions. Some <br />of the issues can be addressed with the DNR model ordinance and guidelines, while other issues <br />do not have guidance from the DNR. As part of this process, staff has been researching <br />regulations in other cities, particularly for those issues not addressed by the DNR. For the most <br />part, the regulations vary considerably from city to city. <br /> <br />The list of issues and questions is divided into two parts. The first part includes those concerns <br />that have guidance from the DNR and sample language in the DNR model shoreland <br />management ordinance. The second part includes the list of issues and questions that do not <br />have guidance from the DNR. For tonight's meeting, we are not looking for solutions to these <br />concerns. Instead, we want to review the list for completeness, add additional concerns if <br />necessary, and gather additional questions. <br /> <br />For your reference, the applicable sections of the DNR model ordinance are provided for <br />concerns one through six. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for February 17, 2009 <br /> <br />\\Ahdocs1\ah\AHdata\Planning\Planning Cases\2009\09-003 Shoreland Preservation Ordinance \021 709 - CC report - Shoreland Regulation <br />Ordinance. doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />