Laserfiche WebLink
<br />people from subdividing shoreland properties, but it will allow the City to take a <br />closer look at the property and consider other environmental restrictions if necessary. <br /> <br />The DNR model ordinance includes a number of standard definitions that could be useful in <br />Arden Hills but are not included in the City's existing ordinance. These definitions will be <br />added as needed. The DNR model ordinance also includes significantly more commercial and <br />residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. These regulations are not particularly <br />applicable to Arden Hills since the City does not have any resorts, does not have any commercial <br />land immediately adjacent to a lake, and large PUD residential developments would likely not fit <br />the character of the City's lakes. <br /> <br />No or Insufficient DNR Guidelines: <br /> <br />Points seven through 12 are either not addressed by the DNR, or the City has complied with <br />DNR regulations but there are still open issues. Based on our review other city ordinances, there <br />are not any standard methods to address most of these issues. Some of these issues are likely to <br />be controversial with lake property owners, particularly point seven. These issues will require <br />additional discussion; however, staff first wants a complete list of issues and concerns to help <br />guide research, ordinance preparation, and future discussions. <br /> <br />7. Storage along the shoreline. For all intents and purposes, the City does not regulate the <br />storage of non-motorized watercraft, recreational equipment, docks, boatlifts, and other <br />similar items along the shoreline? Are additional regulations needed? To what extent? <br />8. Dock setbacks. Should there be a setback from the side property line for docks? A few <br />cities have required docks to follow side yard setbacks for structures or only permit docks <br />within the center third of the property's shoreland. <br />9. Shoreland usage for docks. <br />· The City does not permit docks to make up more than 10 percent of a property's <br />shoreland width. Along the west side of Lake Johanna, there are a handful of lots <br />with less than 20 feet of shoreline, which would limit a dock to no more than two feet <br />in width. Docks are typically four or more feet wide, although the DNR allows docks <br />up to eight feet wide without a permit. <br />· Most cities lack any type of comparable regulation to Arden Hills. To make these <br />smaller lots usable, the City should consider amending the regulations to allow docks <br />of reasonable width on smaller lots. This could also impact storage of other <br />equipment along the shoreline. <br />1 o. Wetland setbacks. A number of cities have wetland setbacks and the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District encourages the adoption of such setbacks. The setbacks may be <br />consistent for all wetlands or vary depending on the type of wetland. Staff is pursuing <br />more research on this topic. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for February 17, 2009 <br /> <br />\\Ahdocsl\ah\AHdata\Planning\Planning Cases\2009\09-003 Shoreland Preservation Ordinance \021 709 - CC report - Shoreland Regulation <br />Ordinance. doc <br /> <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />