My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1C, PC#09-002 - Walgreen's PUD Concept Review
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
03-16-09-WS
>
1C, PC#09-002 - Walgreen's PUD Concept Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2009 2:33:00 PM
Creation date
4/3/2009 2:29:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
1C, PC#09-002 - Walgreen's PUD Concep
General - Type
1C, PC#09-002 - Walgreen's PUD Concep
Date
3/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.1'" <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The entire traffic flow of the site has been reworked. The revisions will be compatible with the <br />future stoplightl as well as the TCF propertYI and the property to the west. Access through the <br />parking areas is clearly defined with drive lanes that flow in a circular pattern throughout the <br />site. Parking lot access has been removed from the queuing lanes for County Road E. The <br />parking along Lexington Avenue still remains. The effect of this parking is minimized by the <br />grade differential at lexington, and the grade at the intersection. The location of the Arden <br />Hills sign will also reduce the visual impact of any parking at this location. The parking in this <br />area for the pharmacy is what is typical for the pharmacy standards. The current scheme does <br />add additional retail near this location that uses some of the parking on the east side. The <br />additional retail will add a retail presence to the intersection of Lexington and County Road E. <br /> <br />0.:;" <br /> <br />-:.: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although architectural character will be submitted at a later time] we understand it is an <br />important issue. We are currently showing buildings that begin to address some of the <br />concerns expressed by council and staff. The red roofs have been removed} and the buildings <br />are intended to suggest a variety of users. The added retail square footage will also provide for <br />a more storefronts and glazing to the project. <br /> <br />Landscaping will also be addressed in more detail later, however we are showing a more <br />integrated approach to how the landscaping will be incorporated at the intersection, and will <br />help to define the front door to the project. This landscaping will also be integrated with the <br />drive lanes providing additional green areas at the interior of the site. <br /> <br />The plan has been greatly improved through the comments from the workshop and from staff. <br />We believe the new plan is a good fit with the 82 District guidelines.. The design and <br />development team look forward to additional comments. <br /> <br />SincerelYI <br />COLLAGE ARCHITECTS <br /> <br /> <br />Pete Keely A.I.A. <br />President <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.