Laserfiche WebLink
structure encroaches within the 50 -foot setback from the Karth Lake OHW by as much as <br />20.3 feet at one point. <br />The new dwelling will include a series of dormers on the second story along the front side of <br />the structure. The dormers on the dwelling would not increase the volume within the front <br />yard setback as the former dwelling had similar features. However, to complement the house, <br />the attached garage would be increased in height and also include a dormer, extending to the <br />front of the garage itself. The dormer is purely decorative and would not be an occupied <br />space. While a majority of the garage, including the raised roof, is outside of the setbacks, the <br />portion within the 6.4 feet front yard encroachment would be noticeably enlarged by the <br />addition of the dormer. While the City allows legally nonconforming structures to be rebuilt <br />on the existing footprint with a similar volume, Section 1350.04 states that nonconforming <br />buildings shall not be enlarged to occupy a greater area or height that augments its <br />nonconformity. Thus, a variance is required to allow the dormer to be constructed on the <br />second story of the garage. <br />When the home was originally constructed in 1979 it met both the front and shoreland <br />setbacks at the time. The front yard setback appears to have been 30 feet at the time, since <br />most of the homes in this area are setback similarly. In addition, Karth Lake has increased in <br />depth dramatically over the years due to the absence of adequate drainage out of the lake. A <br />water pump has since been installed to stop the encroachment of the lake into the <br />surrounding properties. The result of this geographic anomaly is that the homes around the <br />lake have lost between 20 and 30 feet of property, making most of them non -conforming. <br />Had the lake not risen the applicants home could have simply been rebuilt to meet the front <br />and shoreland setbacks and the dormer would not have become an issue. Staff has included <br />an aerial photograph of the property from 1953 that indicates the water level change <br />(Attachment B) <br />The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the variance criteria, a survey of the property, <br />and elevations of the dormer (Attachment A). Also attached is an aerial photo and <br />photographs of the site (Attachment B). <br />2. Site Data. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 8, 2009 <br />I '.'Metro-inet.us lardenhiIWPlanningOanning Cases 12fN 999-008 Much Variance (pending)1040809 - PC Report - Yauch Variance.doc <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />