My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-06-09-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2009
>
05-06-09-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 4:08:21 PM
Creation date
4/28/2009 2:10:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 09- <br />008 for a variance at 1156 Amble Drive based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, as <br />proposed in the April 8, 2009, planning case report. <br />3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 09-008 for a variance at <br />1156 Amble Drive based on the following findings... <br />4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 09-008 for a variance at 1156 Amble Drive: a specific <br />reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. <br />Public Hearin <br />Although a public hearing is not required for a variance, the Commission can allow public <br />comments. <br />Notice <br />Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by <br />the City and mailed to properties within three -hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. <br />Resident Comment <br />The City has received comments from one neighbor who lives directly across the street from the <br />subject property and who spoke strongly in favor of the proposal. <br />Deadline for Agency Actions <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on March 16, 2009. <br />Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by May 15, 2009 (60 days), <br />unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review <br />period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 <br />days. <br />A ttac-h mPnte <br />A Application and Supporting Materials <br />B Air Photo and Photographs of the Site <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 8, 2009 <br />IIMetro-inet.usIai-denhillsIPlanningIPlantzing Cases 12009109-008 Yauch Variance (pending)W40809 - PC Report- Yauch Variance.doc <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.