Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT <br />CASE NO. 09-006 <br /> <br />1.0 Recitals. <br /> <br />A. Bethel University, a non-profit institution of higher education ("Permittee"), <br />located on the following real property in the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey <br />County, Minnesota ("Arden Hills"): <br /> <br />Those parts of Section 21,22,27, and 28, Township <br />30, Range 23, lying Westerly and Southerly ot the <br />westerly and southerly right-at-way lines of State <br />Trunk Highway No. 51 and Interstate Highway 694 <br />lying northerly of the northerly right-ot-way line of the <br />Canadian Pacitic Railroad Company and lying <br />northerly and easterly of the northerly and easterly <br />right-ot-way lines ot State Trunk Highway No.1 0, <br />except the South ~ ot the Southeast ~ ot the <br />Southeast ~ ot the Section 21, Township 30, Range <br />23, lying east ot the easterly line ot Highway No.1 0, <br />according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof <br />(herein the "Subject Property") <br /> <br />B. On the 2nd day of March, 2009, Permittee submitted a completed <br />application to Arden Hills requesting that its existing conditional use permit <br />be amended to extend the use ot their temporary modular classrooms tor <br />a period of time not to exceed three years ("Planning Case 09-006n) on <br />the Subject Property. <br /> <br />C. On the 8th day ot April, 2009, Planning Case 09-005 was reviewed at a <br />public hearing by the Arden Hills Planning Commission. The Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission considered the recommendations of the Arden Hills <br />staff, the comments of the public and recommended approval of Planning <br />Case 09-006 subject to certain conditions. <br /> <br />2.0 Approval of the Application. On the 11th day ot May, 2009, the Arden Hills City <br />Council considered Planning Case 09-006, the recommendations of the Arden <br />Hills Staff and Planning Commission, the effects ot the proposed amended <br />conditional use on the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the <br />owners and occupants ot surrounding land and the community as a whole, and <br />determined that the facts and circumstances ot this particular case warranted the <br />