Laserfiche WebLink
<br />attached garage would be increased in height and also include a dormer, extending to the front of <br />the garage itself The dormer is purely decorative and would not be an occupied space. While a <br />majority of the garage, including the raised roof, is outside of the setbacks, the portion within the <br />6.4 feet front yard encroachment would be noticeably enlarged by the addition of the dormer. <br />While the City allows legally nonconforming structures to be rebuilt on the existing footprint <br />with a similar volume, Section 1350.04 states that nonconforming buildings shall not be enlarged <br />to occupy a greater area or height that augments its nonconformity. Thus, a variance is required <br />to allow the dormer to be constructed on the second story of the garage. <br /> <br />When the home was originally constructed in 1979 it met both the front and shoreland setbacks <br />at the time. The front yard setback appears to have been 30 feet at the time, since most of the <br />homes in this area are setback similarly. In addition, Karth Lake has increased in depth <br />dramatically over the years due to the absence of adequate drainage out of the lake. A water <br />pump has since been installed to stop the encroachment of the lake into the surrounding <br />properties. The result of this geographic anomaly is that the homes around the lake have lost <br />between 20 and 30 feet of property, making most of them non-conforming. Had the lake not <br />risen the applicants' home could have simply been rebuilt to meet the front and shoreland <br />setbacks and the dormer would not have become an issue. Staff has included an aerial <br />photograph of the property from 1953 that indicates the water level change (Attachment B) <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the variance criteria, a survey of the property, and <br />elevations of the dormer (Attachment B). <br /> <br />Findin2S of Fact <br /> <br />The Planning Commission offers the following fifteen findings of fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings <br />1. The lot size meets the requirements of the R-l Zoning District. <br />2. The lot meets the width and depth requirements for the R-l Zoning District. <br />3. The new dwelling does not meet all property line setbacks. The dwelling and garage will <br />encroach 10.4 and 6.4 feet into the front yard setback respectively. Portions of the <br />dwelling will also encroach on the 50-foot OHW setback from Karth Lake. <br />4. The dwelling and garage meets all side yard setbacks for the R-I Zoning District. <br />5. The structure coverage meets the requirements of the R-l Zoning District. <br />6. The minimum landscape area meets the requirements of the R -I Zoning District. <br />7. The new dwelling will not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br />8. Dormers are permitted features within the R-l Zoning District. <br />9. The existing dwelling is outside of the IOO-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. <br />10. The applicant has been issued all the necessary building permits by the City to construct <br />the dwelling with the exception of the garage dormer. <br /> <br />Ci~y of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting.for May 11, 2009 <br /> <br />\ IMetro-inet.uslardenhillsIPlanningIPlanning Cases12009\09-008 Yauch Variance (pending) \05 1 109 - CC Report - Yauch Variance.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />