My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7E, Planning Case 09-007 Site Plan Review for 3585 Lexington Avenue North
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-11-09-R
>
7E, Planning Case 09-007 Site Plan Review for 3585 Lexington Avenue North
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 11:34:43 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 11:31:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Planning Case 2009-07 - Site Plan Review
General - Type
3585 Lexington Avenue North
Date
5/11/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 6, 2009 <br /> <br />Plannin2 Case 09-007: Si2D Standard Adiustment: Arden Plaza: Wellin2ton <br />Mana2ement Companv - Not a Public HearinJ! <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman explained the applicant has requested a site plan review for a sign <br />standard adjustment that would allow for a deviation from the sign code for the location <br />of permitted portable signs. She stated the applicant is proposing to designate an area <br />located within 15 feet of their driveway entrance along County Road E as an acceptable <br />location for the placement of permitted portable signs and this designated area would be <br />shared among the businesses of Arden Plaza and would be used for advertising. She <br />noted the sign standard adjustment would allow for a single permitted portable sign to be <br />placed within this designated area at. a time; the signs would be standard static signs, <br />would not exceed six square feet, and would not be lit. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman then presented the application. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated the sign code allows for adjustment if criteria number one <br />or two is met and the required criteria number three is met. She stated in this case, <br />criteria number one and three are most applicable. She stated Staff recommends approval <br />of the sign standard adjustment based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the <br />following six conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted. <br />Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, <br />shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />2. One permitted portable sign that does not exceed six square feet, is not <br />illuminated, and is displayed only during regular business hours shall be <br />allowed at a time in the designated area within fifteen feet of the County <br />Road E driveway. <br /> <br />3. The sign shall not be placed in the right of way. <br /> <br />4. The sign shall meet all other requirements of the Sign Code. <br /> <br />5. This approval shall not impact any temporary signage requirements of the <br />Sign Code. <br /> <br />6. The sign standard adjustment shall expire upon the implementation of a <br />new monument sign on the site or within two years of the date of issuance, <br />whichever comes first. <br /> <br />Commissioner Modesette asked if the proposed signs would be sandwich board type <br />SIgnS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.