Laserfiche WebLink
5. The tower would be at least partially screened from adjacent properties by trees to the <br />east and south. <br />6. The City would not be party to the lease agreement and would not own or be responsible <br />for maintaining the equipment shed. <br />7. The site is a minimum of 170 feet from the closest property line (to the east) and is <br />located adjacent to the smallest of the four eastern campus parking lots. This site appears <br />to have been selected with regard to decreasing obtrusiveness to adjacent properties and <br />public streets. <br />8. The tower setback would be greater than that of campus buildings. <br />9. The minimum required rear and side interior setback for accessory structures in the B-1 <br />Zoning District is 10 feet, of which the tower would exceed. <br />10. The tower setback from Bethel Drive would be greater than that of any principal <br />buildings along the street. <br />11. The tower setback from the nearest property line would be greater than its height. <br />12. There are no limits on the number of towers or antennas in non-residential lots. <br />13. There are no specific requirements for screening of cellular towers outside of City water <br />tower sites. <br />14. Cellular towers and antennas are a conditionally accessory use in the B-1 Zoning District. <br />On the Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: <br />15. The proposed plan would not have any impact on traffic or parking conditions. <br />16. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, <br />dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. <br />17. The proposed plan will not impact drainage. <br />18. The proposed plan will not impact population density. <br />19. The proposed plan is expected to have a visual impact from surrounding properties, <br />though is not expected to have an impact on land use compatibility with uses and <br />structures on surrounding land or adjoining land values. <br />20. Park dedications are not applicable. <br />21. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning <br />Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. <br />Notice <br />Notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City <br />and mailed to residents within three -hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. <br />Public Comments <br />At this time the City has not received any comments from the public regarding this project. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for June 3, 2009 <br />P: IPlanningWlanning Cases 12009109-009 Bethel CUP Amend with AT&T (pending) 1060309 - PC Report - Bethel AT&T CUP Amendment. doc <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />