Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jun-08-20D9 15:15 <br /> <br />From-PETERSON FRAM BERGMAN <br /> <br />6512281753 <br /> <br />T-416 P.DDZ/006 F-998 <br /> <br /> <br />LMC <br />~ ufNmtJiJ6l1t4 06a <br />CJtt.~", ..J/nw <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />Insurance Trust <br />145 Universlt;y Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55:103-2044 <br />(65.1) :281..1200 · (BOO) 925-1122 <br />Fax: (651) 281-1298 · TOO: (651) 281..1290 <br />www..lmnc.org <br /> <br />RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION <br />ELECTRONIC COMIvIUNICATIONS <br />BETWEEN COUNCIL :MEJvIBERS <br /> <br />E-mail correspondence can be an unintentional conduit for city officials to violate the Minnesota <br />Open Meeting Law. This memo outlines some points elected officials and members of city <br />committees and boards should be aware of to avoid inadvertently vi~lating the Open Meeting <br />Law. <br /> <br />The Open Meeting Law <br /> <br />Under the :Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn.. Stat.. ~ 13D, meetings of at least a quorum of the <br />city council or one of its committees to discuss city business must be publicized and open to the <br />public, subject to a few exceptions. A primaty purpose ofth.e law is to make sure information <br />and deliberations about city business are available to the public. <br /> <br />The law applies to any discussion about city business, not just voting or official actions, and to <br />any gathering of a quorum of the councilor COmmittee9 In most cities a quorum is tmee or more <br />council or committee members. <br /> <br />It)s easy to imagine situations where a quorum might gather - coffee at the local cafe~ pre- or <br />post-meeting discussions, a wedding reception or communi~ celebration are all common spots <br />for councilmembers to meet. There are also some not-so-obvious ways a quorum might meet, <br />for instance in a serial meeting - imagine Council Member A talks to Council Member B, B talks <br />to Council Member C, and C talks to A. Another is through written correspondence, or through <br />telephone conference calls. Any of these scenarios would create an open meeting concern if the <br />group discussed city business. <br /> <br />Violating the open meeting law carries with it penalties including personal liability for up to <br />$300 per occurrence and forfeiture of office for officials who intentionally violate the law three <br />times. Reasonable costs and attorney fees can also be awarded if the court finds specific intent to <br />violate the law. <br /> <br />Electronic communications and the Open Meetiug Law <br /> <br />The Minnesota Open Meeting Law bas a number of tricky aspects) not the least of which results <br />from increasing reliance on e-mail communication between councilor committee members.. <br /> <br />Tbh; matert~1 Ii prOYlcl.~ 1$ general information ,qnd Is nCt a Sabstltute for leg,I idvfGI. <br />Consult 10llf attorney for iJdviCt concerning .paClflC tnaatJons. <br />