My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A, Approve Contract with Eureka Recycling
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-29-09-R
>
8A, Approve Contract with Eureka Recycling
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2009 9:50:36 AM
Creation date
6/26/2009 9:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Approve Contract with Eureka Recycling
General - Type
Approve Contract with Eureka Recycling
Date
6/29/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />adminlOl 125 February, 200904:58 <br /> <br />Aluminum prices fell 55 percent (from $3,380 to $1,465 per metric ton, or from $1.53 per pound <br />to 66 cents per pound) from mid-July to late October. In just those three months, prices lost five <br />years of gains. Prices have fallen like a rock because demand has plummeted (greatly influenced <br />by fear and risk aversion), causing the biggest annual visible surplus on record. Prices are trading <br />below average output cash costs ($1,550 per metric ton, or 70 cents per pound), even taking into <br />account much lower energy and raw material prices that have resulted from the global recession. <br /> <br />We estimate that approximately 75 percent of global aluminum output is losing money on a cash <br />basis (This does not take into account sustaining capital costs, depreciation nor return on <br />capitaL). Practically all output is in the red if we consider the full cost of producing aluminum. In <br />this context, we expect prices to fall further in the next weeks, as public inventories keep growing <br />given that output continues to lack the flexibility and speed to adjust to depressed demand. <br /> <br />We see $1,300 per metric ton (or 60 cents per pound) as probable in the first quarter of 2009. <br /> <br />HiTTiNG BOTTOM <br /> <br />Nevertheless, when we hit bottom-We believe it probably will be between the first and third <br />quarter of 2009-we could see a "V" type violent bounce in demand and price for a number of <br />reasons, including the historical dislocation of demand VS. its own 10 term trend; the sharp <br />distortion of prices vs. output costs; the unprecedented and aggressive stimulus programs <br />authorities around the globe have introduced on the fiscal, monetary and financial fronts; and the <br />lagged but still significant aluminum output curtailments and expansion deferrals that have taken <br />place in the fourth quarter of 2008. <br /> <br />The consensus view is similar, forecasting a "V" bounce in prices starting in the second half of <br />2009. The bottom line is: Conditions are not present for a sustainable price bounce yet (prices will <br />continue to stay low and to trend downward), but conditions are already present for a potential <br />violent upward move later in 2009. <br /> <br />The main reason behind the plummeting prices has been the sharpest contraction in global <br />demand that the aluminum market ever has experienced in a six-month period. We estimate that <br />global demand has contracted more than 25 percent from May 2008 through December 2008. <br />Aluminum demand from the United States and Europe is down approximately 40 percent from its <br />peak in the second quarter of 2008. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.