My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-09-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
01-20-09-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 9:58:17 AM
Creation date
7/16/2009 9:52:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
City Council Worksession Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
1/20/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - JANUARY 20, 2009 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the PTRC has not discussed this in great depth and <br />detail. She explained that Ms. Olson had instructed the PTRC to review the plans <br />and report back at the next meeting to arrive at a consensus. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead questioned if the railroad should be contacted before a decision <br />was made on the trail side. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant suggested a conversation be held with the railroad to make <br />sure they are still on board. He stated the railroad should also be asked if they will <br />be redoing the bridge as this would impact the trail. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated the report was done very well but that <br />additional information should be gathered listing the pros and cons of each side, <br />including costs before a decision was made. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the PTRC will discuss this in more detail at the <br />February meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked that safety be a deciding factor in this decision as <br />well and not cost alone. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated Bolton & Menk were scheduled to attend three <br />meetings and asked if a public meeting should be held to inform residents of the CP <br />Rail report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she felt a public meeting was not necessary at this <br />time and except to address the bottleneck concerns. She indicated this trail was <br />still several years out. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung felt a public meeting was not necessary or critical to <br />deciding the trail path. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga questioned if Bolton & Menk should initiate conversations <br />with CP Rail and if these costs should be investigated. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated this would have to be brought back to Council if not <br />included in the current feasibility study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated it was her understanding this was covered within <br />the current study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.