Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - FEBRUARY 17, 2009 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead indicated water runoff from large parking lots should be <br />addressed within this Ordinance. He stated the water quality and pleasure of the <br />lakes will be improved by addressing this Ordinance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Lehnhoff explained that Northwestern has <br />created their storm water ponding systems through the Rice Creek Watershed. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Lehnhoff thanked the Council for their <br />comments and stated additional comments could be forwarded to staff. <br /> <br />D. Review of Pay Levels for Temporary/Seasonal Positions <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse presented the City Council with background <br />information on the temporary/seasonal positions within the recreation programs <br />throughout the City. He indicated this included both park attendants and public <br />works seasonal employees. <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse explained the City approves the temporary/seasonal <br />employee pay ranges each year and stated for 2009 the ranges would be kept <br />similar to 2008 accept for the two lowest pay levels, which were increased by 25~. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the City of Arden Hills is paying 10-20% more <br />than neighboring communities for temporary and seasonal positions. She indicated <br />the City was overpaying their temporary help and that the City should watch these <br />pay ranges more closely to align with the competition. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Manager Olson explained she regularly researches the pay <br />scales with neighboring cities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated it would have benefited the Council to see the <br />research before approving the pay ranges. <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse explained staff could pull together a spreadsheet with <br />the pay range information from various cities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated these pay ranges may have been adequate <br />several years ago when there were more jobs than people, but due to the current <br />economic trends, these numbers should be reevaluated. <br />