Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - FEBRUARY 17, 2009 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />options could be drawn up as concept plans, brought to Shoreview and signed off <br />by them. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the need for staff to report on the progress of issues to <br />Council in a more timely fashion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if regular congressional communication could be <br />added as a priority for 2009, along with the National Guard. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed and stated the City needs to establish a <br />comprehensive lobbying plan. He felt that this was an area the Council could <br />Improve. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead felt Items A, H and Communication/Lobbying items were the <br />main priorities thus far. The Council was in agreement. Mayor Harpstead <br />questioned what additional items should be elevated within this document. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden suggested Item E be elevated due to the possibility of <br />federal stimulus funds. Councilmember Grant agreed. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead indicated he would like to see the bridge built in 2009 but <br />questioned ifit was a shovel ready project. <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse explained it met the definition of a shovel ready <br />project and that a feasibility report was completed for this bridge. He indicated <br />plans and specifications were not complete at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead explained that he would like to see the City pursue outside <br />funding and complete construction of the bridge for the next item. The Council <br />was in agreement. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead indicated the next item addressed within the goals was a <br />complete in depth review of the City's key public safety services while developing <br />a long term plan to ensure the most effective and efficient delivery of public safety. <br />He questioned if this included a review of Fire Station #1. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated the condition of Fire Station #1 may need to <br />be reviewed in the near future. <br />