My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
03-30-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 9:59:54 AM
Creation date
7/16/2009 9:54:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
3/30/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - March 30, 2009 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />City Engineer Giga stated that the current width is 35 feet including the sidewalks. <br /> <br />City Engineer Bloom stated that the widening would go from the 35 feet that exist <br />today to a total of 42 feet. There is additional structural analysis that would need to <br />occur for this. The result of the meeting was the widening of the bridge may trigger <br />a variety of other things that are outside of the scope of the City. The City would <br />not be able to get a letter of support from MnJDOT for the County Road E-2 Bridge <br />Improvements project by the deadline date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for clarification on what was meant by widening. <br /> <br />City Engineer Bloom stated that at this time they have only talked to MnlDOT <br />Bridge and they are the group that the City would need to get a letter of approval <br />from for this project. At this time what they have told the City is that they would <br />not be able to provide such approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated in the B2 Plan the City wanted to pursue this <br />bridge and this was one of the priorities and now this project is going to be more <br />than was estimated with the B2 Plan. <br /> <br />City Engineer Giga stated that there was another option suggestion at the meeting <br />and that was to pursue a stand alone pedestrian bridge on the north side. The <br />proposal that was submitted in 2006 for the Cooperative Agreement was a 7.5 foot <br />sidewalk attached to the bridge, which is currently substandard to MnJDOT <br />regulations that recommend a minimum of 8 feet. If a stand alone bridge was built <br />it could be built to the width that the City wants. The preliminary costs that <br />MnJDOT Bridge provided was about $750,000 to $1,000,000 depending on the <br />amount of right-of-way that would need to be taken. There are other factors that <br />also need to be looked at including utilities and water mains. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if City Engineer Giga was referring to a separate <br />stand alone pedestrian bridge. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead asked if this would be a steel construction. <br /> <br />City Engineer Giga stated that she was referring to a separate stand alone <br />pedestrian bridge possibly constructed with steel. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there would be enough time to complete this <br />option for the ARRA funding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.