My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-11-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:07:27 AM
Creation date
7/16/2009 9:57:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
5/11/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—May 11, 2009 17 <br /> She stated that there is a provision in the code that any si gn not incompliance can be <br /> removed by the City. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated that these types of signs continue to appear. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated that there was only the one violation at Arden <br /> Plaza and it was resolved. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated that the sign had been removed within 24 hours of <br /> the City contacting them. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how many signs were being permitted. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated that one 6 square foot A-frame sign at a time was <br /> being approved and what businesses were listed on this would be determined by the <br /> tenants and the property management. <br /> Mayor Harpstead clarified that it would be six square feet on each side of the sign. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated that this was correct. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that this was temporary and would expire at the time <br /> the monument sign was in place. He asked if regular business hours were defined <br /> in the sign code because the fitness business is open 24 hours. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated that the code only states that the sign could be out <br /> during the business' regular business hours. This did include if the business was <br /> open twenty four hours then the sign could be displayed for twenty four hours'. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked what the height of the sign would be and how this <br /> was measured. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated that the sign would have to meet the City's current <br /> height requirement in the district and this would include any base height. <br /> Councilmember Grant clarified that the sign being placed could also be a T-sign. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated that the code states that the sign can not be <br /> placed in the site line and with having such a limited amount of space to place the <br /> sign this would be difficult to enforce. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.