Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />SC>LTC)N & I'/IENK, INC@ <br /> <br />Consulting Engineers & Surveyors <br />12224 Nicollet Avenue · Burnsville, MN 55337 <br />Phone (952) 890-0509. Fax (952) 890-8065 <br />www.bolton-menk.com <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />August 5, 2009 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Kristine Giga, P.E. - Civil Engineer <br />Ron Moorse - City Administrator <br />City of Arden Hills <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Christopher S. Chromy, P.E., P.T.O.E. <br />Senior Transportation Engineer <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Highway] 0/96 Grade Separation Project <br />Feasibility of Pedestrian Crossing of CSAH 96 <br />BMI Project No. T42.222335 <br /> <br />Per your request, I have completed a conceptual analysis of the feasibility of grade-separated pedestrian <br />crossings of CSAH 96, east of TH ] O. My findings and recommendations are summarized below: <br /> <br />Background <br />As part of the TH 10/CSAH 96 grade separation, the city is interested in enhancing pedestrian <br />connections across TH 10 and CSAH 96. The proposed TH 10/CSAH 96 project enhances pedestrian <br />crossing of TH 10 by providing a trail and sidewalk along CSAH 96 as it passes under TH 10. Pedestrian <br />crossings of CSAH 96 are proposed at signalized intersections. At signalized intersections, marked <br />crosswalks and ramps, pedestrian push button and signal heads, and count-down timers will be provided <br />with the TH 10/CSAH 96 project. Signalized intersections are proposed on CSAH 96 at Prior A venue <br />and Old Hwy 10. A future signal is anticipated at CSAH 96 and Rice Creek Parkway. <br /> <br />Grade Separation Alternatives and Cost <br />Several alternatives were evaluated for grade-separated pedestrian crossing of CSAH 96. These included <br />providing additional width on the proposed northbound TH ] 0 bridge, lOx 14 box culvert underpass, and <br />stand alone pedestrian bridge. <br /> <br />TH 10 Bridge - As part of the TH 10/CSAH 96 project, CSAH 96 will be lowered by approximately 22' <br />and two new bridges will be constructed to carry TH ] 0 vehicle traffic over CSAH 96. The bridges will <br />have a span length of approximately 275'. One of these bridges could be constructed with additional <br />width to carry a multiuse trail separated from vehicle traffic. For a 10' trail crossing, approximately 18' <br />of additional width would be necessary on the bridge. At an approximate unit cost of $160/sq.ft., the <br />additional bridge width is estimated to cost nearly $800,000. In addition, to make the crossing accessible <br />to pedestrians and bicycles along CSAH 96, trail and sidewalk extensions of approximately 600 feet <br />would be necessary on both sides of CSAH 96. This could likely be accomplished in the southeast <br />quadrant of the intersection; however it is unlikely in the other three quadrants due to the proximity of <br />proposed ramps and roadways. <br /> <br />This concept is not recommended for several reasons. First, the skew of the TH 10 bridge results in a <br />longer span than necessary to cross CSAH 96 and results in a higher cost than a perpendicular crossing. <br />