My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-08-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2009 4:47:32 PM
Creation date
8/13/2009 4:46:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular Council Minutes
General - Type
Regular Council Minutes
Date
6/8/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - June 8, 2009 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant clarified that the options provided for the deferred <br />assessment were the only options available to the City. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated that for the deferred interest rate the options provided <br />are the options that are listed in the state statutes. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that there is a fourth issue in that the interest rate itself <br />needs to be set by the Council. He asked if this interest rate had to be equal to the <br />interest rate that was established for the 10-year assessment plan. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated that the interest rates could be different. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead clarified that Staff was looking for direction regarding the <br />deferred assessment including interest, terms, and period. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that there are four properties in this project that <br />have been identified as 2 REUs. Even though there is no intention of subdividing <br />these properties at this time there have been situations in the past where a lot was <br />subsequently subdivided. She stated that she would be willing to forgive the loan <br />for the second REU but if the property were to be subdivided before the end of 30 <br />years then the full amount would have to be paid. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if Councilmember Holden was referring to forgiving <br />the principle and interest or just the interest. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that the principle could not be forgiven. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla stated that the Council could choose not to defer the <br />assessments and treat these four properties as 1 REU rather than two. If the Council <br />adopts a deferred assessment roll, it will become due and payable at some point. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead asked if Ms. Dachtera had any additional information that <br />compared the assessment rate with other cities. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated that each city sets their assessment policy differently <br />depending on how they fund the remaining portion of their projects. It is difficult to <br />compare assessment policies between cities. <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse stated that in Ms. Dachtera's example Oakdale <br />assesses 35% of the amount and Arden Hills assesses 50%, which results in a lower <br />assessment amount but not a lower cost in building the road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.