Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - June 29, 2009 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />Attorney to Draft a Resolution with regard to TCAAP to state that it is <br />the consensus of the majority of the Council that the TCAAP land <br />should be parks, trails, open space and recreational land. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem McClung clarified that this motion was for the City <br />Administrator and the City Attorney to draft a resolution and bring it to the City <br />Council at the July 13, 2009 meeting. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla clarified that this motion was directing Staff to bring a draft <br />form of the resolution to the July 13 meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that the next City Council meeting is July 13 and the <br />Army/GSA meeting is July 15. This does not allow the Army/GSA a lot of time to <br />react if the City does not pass a resolution until the July 13 meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem McClung stated that there is a TCAAP work session on July 13. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that this was a resolution and there could be <br />another resolution passed at a later date. This resolution would show that there is a <br />consensus of the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked if what were Councilmember Grant's concerns if <br />the Resolution was not passed until the next meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that if the resolution was passed tonight then the <br />Army/GSA would have time to react to it and provide some feedback to the City <br />prior to coming to the meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that this was just a resolution and not the last word <br />on the subject and it would be beneficial to provide this information to the <br />Army/GSA before the July 15 meeting. <br /> <br />Motion was called to a vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked City Attorney Filla if she could withdraw her <br />motion. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla stated that the motion had been called to a vote. At this time a <br />vote would be required. Another motion could be made if Councilmember Holmes <br />did not think this one was accurate. If the Council was to vote on the motion and it <br />passed and Councilmember Holmes wanted a revised motion, then there would be a <br />