Laserfiche WebLink
�rYxrs`sYi �vss`' <br />4. The project location along Old Highway 10 is within Ramsey County's jurisdiction and <br />will require approval and permitting from the County. To begin this process, Bolton & <br />Menk has sent preliminary plans to the Ramsey County Engineer for review and <br />comment. The design for the project includes relocating a section of guardrail on the <br />north side of the bridge closer to the roadway. This is done to minimize retaining wall <br />needs in that area. The relocation will ultimately need approval from the County. <br />5. Bolton & Menk completed the topographic survey for the CP Rail bridge crossing <br />project. With that information, two additional constraints were identified which have an <br />impact on the project design. First, a probable wetland has been identified just north of <br />the bridge crossing, which creates an additional need for retaining wall on the project. <br />Secondly, the survey also revealed a very shallow bury depth of the existing bridge <br />abutment. This results in an increased amount of structural retaining wall necessary to <br />restrain the bridge abutment. In consideration of these design influences and their <br />impacts to the project, the project cost estimate was refined. Construction costs are <br />estimated to be $310,000. Construction administration, observation, and staking are <br />estimated to be $30,000. It should also be noted that construction of the trail crossing <br />along the east side of the roadway would be expected to present similar constraints and <br />cost implications. <br />6. Given the sensitivity of the CP Rail to any work within their right of way, especially in <br />the vicinity of a bridge structure, no formal review or approval process is completed by <br />them without final construction plans. The City's step by step process of first evaluating <br />the feasibility of the crossing, then completing a topographic survey, then preparing the <br />construction plans for approval lends itself to the uncertainty presented by the railroad in <br />what they may ultimately allow. Once the final plans are completed to the satisfaction of <br />the railroad, the City can proceed more confidently in acquiring actual contractor bids for <br />the work as well as outlining the level of consultant oversight desired during <br />construction. <br />7. The proposed alignment for the crossing begins and ends a short distance north and south <br />of the bridge itself (approximately 50 feet south and 150 feet north). These termini will <br />allow for future trails to tie into this segment. Most notably the alignment places the trail <br />directly behind the bridge piers and 2 feet behind the relocated guardrail north of the <br />bridge. The design profile for the crossing was created to tie into the existing roadway <br />grades at both ends and allows for 14 feet of clearance beneath the bridge. This exceeds <br />the minimum clearance required of 10 feet. The profile selected was created to moderate <br />retaining wall needs both under the bridge (above grade) and adjacent to the wetland <br />(below grade) north of the bridge. <br />8. Bolton & Menk understands that the City may choose to pursue State Aid funding to <br />construct this project. Should this be the case, the plans for the project will need to be <br />reviewed and approved by MN/Dot to ensure compliance with applicable standards. <br />Along with that review process, a variance process may be needed to allow the trail to be <br />built with narrower shoulder widths where the trail is being built between the bridge <br />abutment and pier wall. Additional time would be needed to complete this review <br />process if the City elects to utilize State Aid funds for the project. <br />Please contact me to discuss these project developments or to answer any questions you may have as we <br />move forward with the design process. <br />DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW <br />Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. <br />