My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
08-10-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:13:49 AM
Creation date
11/10/2009 8:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
8/10/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—August 10, 2009 6 <br /> portion of the new driveway to complete the repair of the water main, the driveway <br /> contractor informed the residents that the warranty on the driveway was now void. <br /> In December of 2008, City Attorney Jerry Filla spoke with an Attorney representing <br /> the residents. At that time they spoke to some additional options for resolving this <br /> issue. These discussions have been back and forth between City Attorney Filla, the <br /> residents, and their attorney. The current proposal from the residents is for the City <br /> to pay the residents $1,750 as a full and final settlement. The $1,750 proposal is <br /> slightly higher that what it would cost the City to replace the driveway if they did <br /> the work. The cost for the City would be about $1,200 and this would not include <br /> the price for any special equipment that may be needed or any additional cost for <br /> materials because the materials used by the residents were a special blend of <br /> asphalt. City Attorney Filla is recommending the City accept the revised Settlement <br /> and Release Agreement from the residents. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked what exactly the City settling for. She asked if the <br /> amount of money requested was because the resident's warranty had been voided or <br /> if the request was to settle something else. <br /> City Attorney Filla stated that it was his understanding that there was some <br /> settlement in the driveway. <br /> Public Works Director Hoag stated that this was not correct. Originally when the <br /> City did this project the residents wanted the entire driveway replaced. Until the <br /> matter was resolved Staff has repaired the driveway. There is a square that was cut <br /> out of the driveway, which is in the City's right-of-way. Normally as a restoration the City would do a single saw cut across and put in one seamless piece of asphalt. <br /> Councilmember Holden clarified that the residents did not want this done. <br /> Public Works Director Hoag stated that this was correct. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked why the City was settling if the area was in the <br /> City's right-of-way and the patch was what the City normally does. <br /> City Attorney Filla asked Public Works Director what it would cost the city to do <br /> this work. <br /> Public Works Director Hoag stated that the cost would be approximately $1,200 if <br /> the city did it. This amount is for regular asphalt and does not include the rental of <br /> any special equipment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.