Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Michelle Olson <br /> ........................................................... <br /> From: aanerud4@comcast.net <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:06 PM <br /> To: Michelle Olson <br /> Subject: park funding bill <br /> Attachments: Doc1.doc <br /> It is attached (two pages) <br /> so far have been asked to add "local and regional" after the word means in like 1.9 and after <br /> board in 1.14 by the three rivers regional parks board, who with those changes endorse it. <br /> In lines 1.19 a number of people have asked that 'both inside and outside the corporate limits" <br /> be eliminated - I have no strong feeling about it. <br /> Line 2.6 someone has asked that we add 'but not against government owned property" I <br /> guess some sewer system assessments have been charged to park land and they want to <br /> insure that doesn't happen here..1 have no objections. <br /> some people do not like 2.24 through 2.26 and they want any excess money to go back. The <br /> problem is that I don't think the counties have a mechanism to do that, but again I have no <br /> objection. <br /> There are local options in line 2.8 and line 2.17 <br /> This has been endorsed by the Anoka County parks, City of Ham Lake, City managers and <br /> mayors and city council members of a number of cities. <br /> It has been introduced and will get a hearing sometimes after January 1010. <br /> 11/10/2009 <br />