Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—October 12, 2009 10 <br /> 7A. Presentation on Briarknoll Neighborhood Highway Noise Study (continued) <br /> abatement consideration criteria. He also provided maps that showed where the <br /> noise receptors were located that was used in the modeling for the studies. He <br /> covered the lower cost mitigation strategy which included lowering the height of <br /> the wall, building a berm, reducing the length of the wall, and combinations of these <br /> options. He outlined the next steps that the City could take including working with <br /> Mn/DOT as part of the I-694 project, developing a cost sharing agreement, and <br /> completing a feasibility study. <br /> Councilmember Holden clarified that the Federal noise abatement consideration <br /> criteria were used to determine of Federal money could be used for the noise <br /> mitigation. <br /> Mr. Chromy stated that this was used for both State and Federal trunk highway <br /> dollars. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how the noise levels were determined. <br /> Mr. Chromy stated that point N3 on the map is a noise receptor. At this particular <br /> receptor there were actual readings taken. These readings were used to calibrate the <br /> model. There is a set criteria on how the noise measurements are taken and how <br /> often they are taken. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Grant clarified that N3 was an objective measurement and the <br /> rest of the measurements are computer modeled. He asked why the other <br /> measurements are not actual readings as well. <br /> Mr. Chromy stated that N3 was an actual measurement and the other points were - <br /> computer modeled. This is the process that the State uses when assessing the need <br /> for noise mitigation. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that the landscaping at the N3 point is different <br /> than the landscaping in the other locations. She asked if this was taken into <br /> consideration in the model. <br /> Mr. Chromy stated that elevation and landscaping were taken into consideration. <br /> Councilmember Hoiden asked how many residents were included in the study that <br /> resulted in a cost of$9498 per decibel per residence. <br />