My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1A, Rice Creek & TCAAP Trailhead Concept
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
09-30-09-TCAAP-WS
>
1A, Rice Creek & TCAAP Trailhead Concept
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 1:00:10 AM
Creation date
12/1/2009 2:54:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Trail Connection Concept
General - Type
Trail Connection Concept
Date
9/30/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
has expressed support for the City's interest in a north-south trail and has stated that it could be <br /> classified as a regional trail connection. A new north-south trail connection through TCAAP <br /> would likely be called the "Rice Creek South Regional Trail." <br /> There are two general scenarios for a regional trail. The first scenario includes a trail that is <br /> integrated into the development, which would be similar to the previous RRLD concept. The <br /> second scenario involves obtaining a designated trail corridor, which could be along the eastern <br /> side of the property to create an uninterrupted trail corridor. The two scenarios are not <br /> necessarily mutually exclusive, though only one would likely be a regional trail. <br /> Trail Integrated into the Development <br /> A trail integrated into the development would be constructed by a developer as part of a park <br /> dedication requirement. The City is the beneficiary of park dedication, though the land for the <br /> trail could be transferred to the County if they were willing to accept the property. Since the <br /> entire TCAAP property has not been remediated to a residential/recreational standard, it would <br /> be reasonable to include a requirement that the City will only accept land that has been <br /> remediated to a residential/recreational standard as part of the park dedication requirement. The <br /> advantage of a trail integrated into the redevelopment is that it could be designed and located to <br /> provide the most benefit to the redevelopment. <br /> However, the City would need to be aware of the limits of the park dedication requirement. <br /> While the City has quite a bit of leeway in setting a park dedication requirement, it must be in <br /> proportion to the need generated by the new development. Additionally, State Statutes require <br /> cities to have a plan for how or why the park dedication is needed. The City would want to be <br /> cautious in how the park dedication requirement is applied to ensure the most benefit is received. <br /> In this case, a regional trail corridor would have a major impact on the City's park dedication <br /> requirement. Under this scenario, it would also be difficult to obtain or integrate a wider corridor <br /> that allows for a more natural, meandering trail. <br /> Dedicated Trail Corridor <br /> The second scenario involves a dedicated trail corridor that would likely be transferred through <br /> special legislation prior to the public sale. The trail corridor could be along the eastern edge of <br /> the property from Highway 96 to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail and Wildlife Corridor, <br /> which would provide for an uninterrupted trail. Other options could include a trail corridor along <br /> the western side of the property, though that may be less inviting with the adjacent freeways. A <br /> third option could be an undefined corridor of a specific size that the City selects after the <br /> auction and during the redevelopment process. The undefined corridor option would provide the <br /> most flexibility, but additional research is needed to determine if it is feasible. <br /> Mr. Mack has suggested that a dedicated trail corridor should be no less than 150 feet wide, <br /> though there could be some flexibility depending on the location. Generally speaking, a wider <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> IlMetro-inetlardenhillsWdminlCouncilUgendas&Packet Information12009111-30-09 TCAAP Worksession ftcket Information 11A 113009-CC <br /> Memo-RC Trailhead and Rice Creek Trail.doc <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.