|
Message Page 1 of 2
<br /> James Lehnhoff
<br /> Subject: RE: TCAAP Trail Corridor Concept
<br /> From: Comodeca, Michael [mai Ito:mcomodeca@spencerfane.com]
<br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:18 PM
<br /> To: James Lehnhoff; Ron Moorse
<br /> Subject: RE: TCAAP Trail Corridor Concept
<br /> NOTICE OTI��L:.r. This electronic mail transmission constitutes confidential information. The
<br /> transmission.contains information"that maybe protected under t1w attorney-client privilege, work.
<br /> product doctrine,joint defense privilege, and./or other:recognized.privileges or protections under
<br /> the law. The email is not intended.for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If
<br /> you have received this electronic onic mail transmission in error, please delete it Eros .your system
<br /> without copying it, and notify the sender by Reply e-mail or by galling (913)345-8100, so that our
<br /> address record can.be corrected.
<br /> James and Ikon,
<br /> .Here are my responses to your questions red)below. This email only highlights the
<br /> issues. If you want a more detailed analysis,please let me know.
<br /> Questions*
<br /> a 5�.k•'ui`:a:..'�. •,v � would
<br /> ;:Y'• �{,c �cge ,�, �,., have
<br /> ,;w {;'.�,. the
<br /> �;, ,,..�,.. ,.•�;,�..questing
<br /> .k. �..� .y. .�.a .,�•.. land.
<br /> .'•,�',7. �. 's�a; r:. f,,� :•:�,:zz•��,.•`,u'." �.,,, >{,%@ ', d '�•:h:..a �.� �"'"'E�,�> '�'"��:�: "s�,{�..3C .�`'.'3�;.." `�.�s `_'{�� .:4 .Yf ��P��` �"<��
<br /> ' %V ^4 % '�F" H f•. '�'JL IX 4 Y k k•Y�O+A I�'� C �•{•. prior
<br /> •%+'•i #{ '(,':{At '.1 0 p{.. �p'"�}v :3�{•�!C•C 4. Y
<br /> y�.r{ 3f 4"}s 46 '<''S� u' "` � $6 @ '�{ .o,+5 s� 7* ,�{a �',sI' +�, •i,� 2�S2.y#c; ':'NG b �v rh"e ,
<br /> :'w.'s!r�.. .>.� r .$..y`+., .�.. :'�� .';{,of�i.:;.:3` '{.. _i�3}i.,..), `t,� �.. 73.�+�.'n;. ,f�i3r '�.,�3r� 33.,r1`'+3. k.+r,an.:9 ! f.;$'w si.J,^,�x:'
<br /> ,. b:
<br /> I.ha-ve the following concerns:
<br /> (1) It is not apparent-where the money for cl.ean.up of the trail corridor-would come from..
<br /> During the negotiated sale process, the developer was going to pay or the cleanup. But i:l`we
<br /> get title•o the trail. corridor before the public; sale,-we will .not even know Y who t1w developer will
<br /> be and.th.u.s will not be able to get the same assurances. Furthermore, it is my understanding from
<br /> past comments from Mike Fix that the Army is not willing to provide any more funding
<br /> :lior clean"u.p.
<br /> (2) If we buy the trail property without knowing the-reuse plan. for the property, the selected
<br /> location may interfere with the reuse ultimately proposed.
<br /> (3) To protect itself from environmental liability, the City would have to conduct "al:l.
<br /> appropriate-ingt i.ries" to qualify as a "bon.a.:ilde prospective purchaser" under CE CLA..
<br /> Othewise, the "ity would be potentially liable for any environmental contamination on the
<br /> property"merely by being an own.er. The Phase:I environmental study, and any additional
<br /> sampling determined to be necessaryr by the :pity",would.have to be funded..
<br /> (4) You in
<br /> dicate ndica.te that a.trail corridor on the east side of the property would.most likely
<br /> include FO :l"f"parcels. 14'the City gets title to the FC E"f"parcels, it would constitute an early
<br /> transfer and require the Army to go through the (17DR process, I get the impression from CI a }s
<br /> 12/9/2009
<br />
|