Laserfiche WebLink
8) Does the new law apply to local parking ordinance violations? <br />The new law specifically lists out the traffic offenses under Minn. Stat., ch. 169 for which an <br />administrative citation may be issued (see No. 1 above), and specifically prohibits the issuance of <br />administrative citations for other violations of Minn. Stat., ch. 169. Parking violations are not <br />specifically listed as an offense for which the new uniform administrative citation can be issued. <br />However, cities may still issue local administrative citations for parking violations because Minn. <br />Stat. § 169.04 specifically states "the provisions of this chapter [Minn Stat., ch. 169 including <br />Minn. Stat., § 169.999] shall not he deemed to prevent local authorities, with respect to <br />streets and highways under their jurisdiction ...and within the reasonable exercise of the <br />police power from ... regulating the standing or parking of vehicles. " <br />9) Are there limits on how we use the funds from administrative fines? <br />The new law requires that a city impose a fine of $60 per citation. When a city peace officer issues <br />the administrative citation, the fine must be shared with the state in the following manner: two-thirds <br />of the fine ($40) remains with the city that issued the administrative citation and one-third of the fine <br />($20) must be paid to the state Commissioner of Finance for deposit into the state's general fund. <br />Furthermore, one-half of the city's share of the fine ($20) must be used for law enforcement purposes. <br />The new law specifically requires that the funds "be used to supplement but not supplant any existing <br />law enforcement funding." <br />10) Are there any special requirements related to accounting for funds? <br />The new law requires cities to track both the number of citations issued and to separately account for <br />any fine revenues in all city financial reports, summaries, and audits. <br />11) what is a neutral third -party hearing officer? <br />The new law requires that the city inform the recipient of an administrative citation of his or her right <br />to challenge the citation, provide a "civil process" for challenges, and provide a "neutral third party to <br />hear and rule on challenges" to a citation. The law does not provide a definition for a "neutral third <br />party" or provide extensive guidance for cities. However, a common understanding of "neutral" <br />would require that the hearing officer be impartial to both the interests of the city and the recipient of <br />the citation. In addition, a common understanding of "third party" would require that the hearing <br />officer not be one of the principal participants in the controversy (the city or the citation recipient). As <br />a result, the hearing officer should most likely not be the city council as a whole, an individual <br />council member, or a higher -level city officer such as the city administrator or clerk. The neutral third <br />party should be someone hired by the city to specifically handle challenges to citations. <br />12)What can the city do if someone refuses to pay the fine? <br />If a citation recipient does not pay the fine, the city may choose to dismiss the administrative citation <br />and issue a state criminal traffic citation instead. In the alternative, the city may use traditional debt <br />collection methods. There is, however, no authority in the new law for cities to specially assess the <br />fine against real property for payment as taxes. <br />13)Where can I get more information on administrative citations? <br />The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) has developed the Administrative Fines Tool Kit, which is <br />available upon request or can be accessed at www.lmc.org. Please contact Ann Finn at (651) 281- <br />1263 or afinn@ mc.org, or the LMC Research Department at (651) 281-1200 or (800) 925-1122 for <br />more information. <br />Administrative Traffic Citations Tool Kit 6 <br />