Laserfiche WebLink
local regulations. The City's two water towers also have antennas attached to them, which are <br />covered under special provisions in the Zoning Code. <br />Antenna Regulations <br />FCC Regulations <br />The City's regulations must take into account the provisions in the Federal Communications Act. <br />Section 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act preserves state and local authority over zoning and <br />land use decisions for communications antennas; however, it includes limitations on that <br />authority. According to the regulations, a state or local government may not unreasonably <br />discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services, may not regulate in a manner <br />that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services, must act on <br />applications within a reasonable period of time, and must make any denial of an application in <br />writing supported by substantial evidence in a written record. The statute also preempts local <br />decisions premised directly or indirectly on the environmental effects of radio frequency (RF) <br />emissions, assuming that the provider is in compliance with the Commission's RF rules. <br />(htlp:Hwireless.fcc.gov/siting/local-state-gov.html). <br />The FCC also made a ruling in December 2009 that local governments must act upon requests <br />for new antennas on existing towers with 90 days of submitting an application. This is less than <br />what Minnesota Statutes allow for other land use reviews, which can be up to 120 days. The <br />new ruling also states that a city cannot deny one wireless service provider because a competing <br />provider is already located on a particular tower or somewhere else in the city. <br />City Zoning Regulations <br />Section 1325.09 Subd 1 of the City's Zoning Code states that a purpose of regulating antennas, <br />dish antennas, and towers within the City is to "maximize the use of existing and approved <br />towers and buildings to accommodate new personal wireless service antennas in order to reduce <br />the number of new towers necessary to serve the community." Essentially, it has been the City's <br />desire to encourage new antennas to be located on existing platforms (i.e. water tower, antenna <br />tower, or building) where feasible instead of building new antenna towers or monopoles <br />throughout the City. A complete ban on new antennas or antenna towers would conflict with <br />FCC regulations. However, a city can reasonably regulate the location and appearance of new <br />antennas and towers provided the regulation does not prohibit the accessibility to wireless <br />services. <br />In August 2009, the City adopted a code update to set a priority list for the placement of new <br />antennas (Section 1325.09 Subd 6). Again, the goal is to encourage the grouping of antennas to <br />minimize the construction of new antenna towers and limit the aesthetic impact. The code states <br />that new antennas shall be located on City water tower sites unless the applicant shows, to the <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for December 21, 2009 <br />llMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009109-023 Reiling Tower Zoning and CUP Amendment (Pending) 112-21-09- Work <br />Session - Memo - Antennas and Towers.doc Page 4 of 6 <br />