Laserfiche WebLink
Scherbel, and Meagan Beekman conducted a site visit and met with Mr. and Mrs. Schneider. At <br />that time Staff maintained the previous decision that the fence met the requirements of the <br />Zoning Code and explained to Mr. and Mrs. Schneider how to submit an appeal. Their <br />application request for an appeal of Staff's decision is attached (Attachment Q. <br />Zoning Code <br />Section 1325.05 Subd 4D, the City's fence regulations, states as follows: <br />Section 1325.05 Subd 4D <br />1. Height of Fences in Side and Rear Yards. Fences in side or rear yards may not <br />exceed six (6) feet in height in all residential districts. Fences may be up to six (6) <br />feet in height if placed in the secondary front yard of corner lots in residential <br />districts provided that the fence does not exceed three (3) feet in height within the <br />structure setback of the primary front yard and the fence does not encroach on the <br />clear vision area. <br />4. Placement of Fences Along Lot Lines. Fences may be placed along lot lines <br />provided no damage of any kind results to the abutting property. <br />5. Direction of Fence Facing. That side of the fence considered to be the face <br />(facing as applied to fence posts) shall face toward adjoining property. <br />In the past, Staff has interpreted the Code to mean that the height of the fence is the height of the <br />fence panels themselves, placed as near to grade as is practical. Fence panels typically come in <br />three, four, and six foot heights and it is common practice to install them above the ground, <br />rather than in the ground due to rotting. Staff has historically used a common sense approach <br />that allows installers to place fences above the grade itself to prevent rotting of wood, provided <br />that the fence is as near to grade as is possible or reasonable. <br />Fences can be placed up to but not extend over any property lines. Staff generally recommends <br />that home owners install the fence a foot or two into their own property so that the fence can be <br />installed and maintained without trespassing onto neighbors' property; however, the Code does <br />not require this. In most cases the fence is a mutual benefit to both property owners and <br />neighbors generally don't mind having the fence right on the property line. In terms of "damage <br />to abutting property", Staff has historically interpreted this to mean permanent damage, meaning <br />that If damage occurs the fence installer must remedy it to the satisfaction of the abutting <br />property owner. <br />It is very common for communities to require the "finished", or "face" of the fence to face <br />towards abutting properties. Because of this common regulation, many fences are designed or <br />premade to have the same face of both sides. At the time of Mr. and Mrs. Maloney's application <br />City of Arden Dills <br />City Council Meeting for Januaiy 6, 2010 <br />1 Wetro-inet. us 1 aj denhills Planning Planning Cases 12009109-024 Schneider Appeal (Pend ing) W l -10-09 -PC Report Schneider Appeal. doc <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />