01-06-10-PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• The frame studs are toe -nailed poorly into the fence posts with nails with large heads that are mashed in • This is the unfinished side of the fence that shows the 2 x 4 structural frame for the fence o 2 x 4 at the top of the fence o 2 x 4 about 15-24 inches from the top of the fence o 2 x 4 at the bottom of the fence • The framing 2 x 4 studs are indented 1 1/2 inches from the post on the 1774 Gramsie Road side of the fence compared to indentation of 1/2 inches on the 1777 Glenview Avenue side of the fence, further enforcing the argument that the back of the fence faces 1774 Gramsie Road F. Conclusion. In this case, "facing as applied to fence posts" faces the home at 1777 Glenview Avenue, not our home at 1774 Gramsie Road. This is a violation of the Zoning Code. III. The fence is NOT the same on both sides as the contractor used a mixture of S4S cedar, with rough sawn cedar, and 1X boards with a mixture of 2X boards. The 1777 Glenview Avenue side of the fence has different and significantly better material on their side of the fence compared to the 1774 Gamsie Road side of the fence. A. Most fence ordinances require: • If the material used in fence construction is not finished on both sides, the finished side of the material shall be on the outside, facing adjoining properties and all structure supporting the fence shall be on the inside or owners side of the fence. B. Materials. The materials the contractor used to build the fence are not the same on both sides. • The 1777 Glenview Avenue side of the fence has o the finished side of rough sawn cedar as fence face boards o decorative 1 x 4 trim made of finished rough sawn cedar • The 1774 Gramsie Road side of the fence has: o The back side of fence face boards made of rough sawn cedar o 2 x 4 framing studs made of inferior, questionable quality smooth -(not rough sawn cedar), cedar, pine or fir with numerous large knots obvious knots.