My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A, Resolution 2010-002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
01-11-10-R
>
7A, Resolution 2010-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:52:24 AM
Creation date
1/11/2010 3:54:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Preparation of Plans for 2010 PMP
General - Type
Resolution
Date
1/11/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resident Comments/Concerns <br />At the neigh�orhood meeting, several commen�s anc� �o�cerns �vere raised by the <br />res�dents. The most common were concerned With street �vidth, parking, drainage, and <br />assessments. <br />Resldents expressed concerns abaut speeding and through traffic on Valentine Avenue. In <br />respa�se to �hese cancerns, the feasibilit� repor� also provides an option for a 24 foo� <br />wide road. However, �h�s design would not a�Iow the City to use State Aid funds on this <br />�roj ect. <br />Residents had mixed responses abou� t�e need for on-street parking; many did not have <br />concerns, while others would Iike to see on-stree� parking available at aIl tir�es after t�e <br />project is complete. The Lake Johanna Fire Dep�rtme�t has expressed concerns about <br />narrow streets, and have requested that streets �ess than 26 feet wide be posted no parking <br />at a11 times to ensure emergency vehic�e access to properties. <br />Residents throughout the neighborhood expressed �peeif c drainage concerns. The <br />project team w�Il work individually with �hese resi�ents during fnal design. <br />Many reside�ts were also concerned about the tim�ng of this proposed assessment, giv�n <br />the eurrent state of the economy. These concerns are similar to those that were heard <br />during the proEes� for the 2Qa9 PMP. As was aur experience during the 2009 <br />construetion season, street projec�s b�ds are extre�nely campeti�ive, providing both the <br />City and the residents with cos� savings. If b�ds are more expensive than es��mated, they <br />can be rejec�ed. <br />Council Action Requested <br />Staff recomrnends the adoption o� Resolu�ion 2010-002: Orc�ering Pu��ic Improvement <br />and Preparatian of Plans and Specif eations for the 2410 Pavement Management <br />Program. Minnesota Statutes state �hat the adoption of th�s resalution requires a four- <br />fifths vote. <br />�ity Council Meeting <br />\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhiIls�PR&PW\Engineerir�g\�ouncil_Actia�s\20 � 0\� -1 I- I OMema_ZQ I OPMP_OrderPlansSpecs.doc <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.