Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner <br /> City of Arden Mills <br /> Received <br /> 1245 Highway 96 West <br /> Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 City of Arden Hills <br /> Re: Shoreland Setback Requirement Amendment <br /> Dear Ms. Beekman: <br /> I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an <br /> amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4)that would change the <br /> minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots. I oppose the amendment. <br /> I have discussed this matter with several of my neighbors who, like me,are very unhappy <br /> that you are proposing changes to setback requirements. Also,we do not understand how a matter ------ <br /> of this importance is.being considered without any real notice to the community. Residents of <br /> Arden Hills simply do not know that a major zoning change like this is in the works. It is true that <br /> shoreline regulations were discussed at public meetings in the fall, but those discussions did not <br /> include proposals to reduce shoreline setback requirements. <br /> Arden Hills residents with lake fronts are very sensitive to any changes and would much <br /> prefer that no change take place. Let me also say that very few lake front property owners are in <br /> Minnesota in February,so to many residents this amendment will seem like a stealth effort to push <br /> through a major change without their being informed about it. <br /> I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at. <br /> Z <br /> x <br /> Christopher Stanton Date <br />