My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1B, Noise Mitigation Discussion
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
02-16-10-WS
>
1B, Noise Mitigation Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 1:43:10 AM
Creation date
2/16/2010 3:14:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Noise Mitigation Discussion
General - Type
Noise Mitigation Discussion
Date
2/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ri <br /> August 7, 1999 <br /> Mr Dennio Probst, Mayor <br /> Mr, Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator <br /> Mo. E3everly Ap[ikowskl, Council Member <br /> Mr. Gregg Larson, Council Member - <br /> Mr. Paul Malone, Council Member <br /> Mo. Lois Rem, Council Member <br /> City of Arden Hillo <br /> 4304 Wcot Round Lake Road <br /> Arden Hillo, MN 55112 <br /> Dear Mayor, City Administrator, Council Members: <br /> Subject: Highway 961U5 Highway 10 Reconotruction . <br /> At the Ramsey Courtty's recent pub[ic informational meeting held at the Arden Hills <br /> City Hal(, various alternative plate for the reconstruction of Highway 9�o/U5 Highway 10 were <br /> presented by the Ramsey County project Manager. It to our understanding that the City is <br /> requesting citizen input from property owners living within the directly affected <br /> reconstruction area. As a step in helping the City reach an approved final design for the <br /> Highway 961U5 10 reconstruction, the enclosed (ist of property owners living adjacent to the <br /> reconstruction project are requesting the City to require, ao a condition of approving any <br /> final plan, that the project include the construction of a City-approved barrierlwall along the <br /> west side of Highway 10. Thio request ir; based on safety as well as the issue of allowing the <br /> affected area to retain the residential character along the. east 0hore of Round Lake. <br /> The reconstruction project will increase traffic a(ong U5 Highway 10. Yhis barrier will <br /> also restrict pedestrian access to Highway 10, Cold Highway 10 runs parallel with U5 Highway <br /> 10, and the barrier will allow the necessary protection from oncoming traffic for both south <br /> bound traffic on U5 Highway 10 as well as traffic traveling north on 01d Highway 10. Driven <br /> of vehicles cannot readily determine oncoming traffic location, which can be considered as <br /> being in their traffic lane. Thio barrier will eliminate thlo potential traffic hazard. 'lease give <br /> this request your serious consideration before arriving at your decision as -to the, best plan <br /> for our City. <br /> As we can See from the ongoing Highway 96 reconstruction, the State and County <br /> have accommodated the needo and interests of the affected communi'Veo along each portion <br /> of this project. We trust that like consideration will be given to thls reconstruction. For this <br /> rcason, we fee[ it is important that you address this request as a necessary link to the <br /> completion of this project as it affects our community. <br /> Respectfully Yours, <br /> (5ce, enc106ed list) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.