My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-10-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
02-08-10-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 5:00:06 PM
Creation date
2/25/2010 11:15:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular Minutes
General - Type
Regular Minutes
Date
2/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—February 8, 2010 8 <br /> 7.A. Mn/DOT I694 Project Update (continued) <br /> to 135W. He asked if the improvement of adding the additional throughput lane in each direction <br /> was on Mn/DOT's schedule? <br /> Mr. Lindeberg stated before Mn/DOT can begin a lane expansion project they need to make the <br /> improvements to the Snelling/Highway 10 area. It is not currently possible to get six lanes of <br /> traffic between I3 5E and I3 5 W without making these improvements. Having these improvements <br /> would allow the roadway to be setup for the opportunity to add the fifth and sixth lanes. There <br /> have been discussions about the two additional lanes. He clarified that he cannot say that this is <br /> something that is funded and going to happen, only something that has been discussed. Mn/DOT <br /> is in the process of developing its MHSIS, which is looking at its fifty-year getting d an plan an <br /> p g g <br /> idea as to what is going to be needed and what can be done. The additional lanes for this section <br /> of road will be on this plan but it is not currently on any scheduled plan. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated he has not seen the level of leadership from Mn/DOT in regard <br /> to this that he would like. <br /> Mr. Lindeberg reviewed the different concept plans that will be presented at the open house for <br /> public input. He stated that Option 1 is not really feasible but it will still be presented to the <br /> public at the open house for their input. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked who owns the land that would be used in Option 2. <br /> Mr. Lindeberg clarified this property is owned by Mn/DOT. He stated that the loop in Option 2 <br /> ,is substandard and this could be a problem that would need to be looked at. He stated that Option <br /> 5 may have safety issues as well. All the Options will be presented to the public. <br /> Councilmember Holden clarified that the input received from the open house on Thursday would <br /> reduce the number of design options. <br /> Councilmember Holmes pointed out that the open house is on Thursday from 3:00 p.m. to 6:30 <br /> p.m. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the number of loops on the road would reduce the number of <br /> people who would utilize the road. <br /> Mr. Lindeberg stated people do not shy away from a road because of loops but this would also <br /> depend on the other options that are available to the driver. He also reviewed the ro osed <br /> p p <br /> schedule in regard to this project. Mn/DOT will be determining a preferred design in April 2010 <br /> and bring that to the City for municipal consent. They are looking at an April 2011 letting date, <br /> which would mean construction in the summer of 2011. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the NAC process would be done by April. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.