Laserfiche WebLink
also attached. Please refer to the January 6, 2010, Planning Case report for the previously <br />proposed survey of the property — v�►�vwv.ci.arden-hills.mn.us/�lannin cases <br />Findin�s of Fact <br />The Planning Commission offers the following seventeen findings of fact for review: <br />Gene�al Findings <br />1. The lot size meets the requirements of the R-1 Zoning District. <br />2. The lot meets the depth requirements for the R-1 Zoning District. <br />3. The lot is only 70 feet wide which does not meet the 95 foot width requirement for the R- <br />1 Zoning District. <br />4. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new home in its <br />place. <br />5. The existing home currently encroaches into both side yard setbacks. <br />6. The proposed home would increase the setback on the west side of the property from 7.9 <br />feet to ten feet, bringing it into conformance with the current Code. The front and lake <br />side setbacks would meet the minimum requirements of the Code. <br />7. The proposed home would encroach 5.1 feet into the required 15 foot side yard setback to <br />the east. <br />8. The proposed structure coverage meets the requirements of the R-1 Zoning District. <br />9. The proposed minimum landscape area meets the requirements of the R-1 Zoning <br />District. <br />10. The proposed home would not exceed 35 feet in height. <br />11. The proposed garage is outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. <br />l 2. There is no proposed tree removal for this proj ect. <br />T�ariance Findings: <br />13 . Single-family homes are a reasonable use within the R-1 Zoning District because they are <br />permitted within the Zoning Code. <br />14. The property is unique in the City due to the narrowness of the lot and steep topography <br />to the north. <br />15. The circumstances of the property were not created by the landowner because the lot was <br />platted prior to their taking ownership. <br />16. The proposed east side yard setback encroachment would not alter the essential character <br />of the neighborhood because most homes in this area are nonconforming in terms of side <br />yard setbacks and the west side yard setback would be increased to meet the requirements <br />of the Code. <br />17. The construction and location of the home is not based on economic considerations alone, <br />because tree preservation, distance to the lake, location of neighboring properties, and <br />City ofArden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for Ap�il 26, 2010 <br />IlMetro-inetlardenhillslAdminl CouncillAgendas & Packet Information1201014-26-10 RegularlPacket Information104-26-10 - Regular Meeting - <br />PC 09-022 - Memo.doc <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />