05-05-10-PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

addition to the home that would function as a more efficient and functional entryway that suits the needs of a growing family. This variance is unlikely to create a negative impact on the neighborhood or City because the homes around the cul-de-sac do not have consistent setbacks, the neighbors are in favor of the project, and it would certainly enhance the appearance of the front fagade of the home. It does not appear that the variance is based on economic considerations alone. _ As is often the case, the evaluation criterion that states "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner," is the difficult evaluation criterion. The property itself is not unique; however,the way the home is situated on the lot could be considered unique since there are no alternatives available to the property owners to improve access to their home in a way that would not require a variance. The applicant purchased the home after it was built. Before making a motion for approval or denial, this specific variance evaluation criterion must be addressed for the official record. If the Planning Commission recommends approval on this variance, Staff recommends the following five conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall use best management practices (BMPs) to control erosion at all times during construction. 3. The applicant shall obtain approval or a waiver from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 5. The addition will match the color and siding of the existing structure. Options The findings in this report are not specific enough to fully support approval or denial of the variance. With a motion to approve or deny, the findings or the reasons for the motion must be stated. The following criterion must be addressed: ■ The proposed home will/will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or the City because... Once the findings are stated, a full motion to approve or deny can be made. If there is a motion to table, it is not necessary to state the findings. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 10-007 for a variance at 1146 Waldon Place based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the five conditions in the May S, 2010,planning case report. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for May 5, 2010 C:IDOCUME-1 WEAGAN—LBEETLOCALS-1ITemp1ELFM05-05-10-PC Report-Goldman Variance.doc Page 5 of 6