Laserfiche WebLink
the combined effect of the amendment requests would allow additional antennas on <br />communications towers that exceed the height of 75 feet, and were in existence prior to the <br />adoption of this amendment, up to the limit of the CUP under which each tower operates. <br />FCC Regulations <br />Whenever a city reviews its antenna ordinances, it is important to consider federal <br />regulations. All cities must take into account the provisions in the Federal Communications <br />Act. Section 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act preserves state and local authority over <br />zoning and land use decisions for communications antennas; however, it includes limitations <br />on that authority. According to the regulations, a state or local government may not <br />unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services, may not <br />regulate in a manner that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless <br />services, must act on applications within a reasonable period of time, and must make any <br />denial of an application in writing supported by substantial evidence in a written record. The <br />statute also preempts local decisions premised directly or indirectly on the environmental <br />effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions, assuming that the provider is in compliance with <br />the Commission's RF rules. (http://wireless.fcc. gov/siting/local-state-gov.html). <br />City Zoning Regulations <br />Section 1325.09 Subd 1 of the City's Zoning Code states that a purpose of regulating <br />antennas, dish antennas, and towers within the City is to "maximize the use of existing and <br />approved towers and buildings to accommodate new personal wireless service antennas in <br />order to reduce the number of new towers necessary to serve the community." Essentially, it <br />has been the City's desire to encourage new antennas to be located on existing platforms (i.e. <br />water tower, antenna tower, or building) where feasible instead of building new antenna <br />towers or monopoles throughout the City. Cities are allowed to regulate towers in such a <br />manner provided it does not leave parts of a community without access to wireless services. <br />In August 2009, the City updated the Zoning Code to include a priority list for the placement <br />of new antennas (Section 1325.09 Subd 6). Again, the goal is to encourage the grouping of <br />antennas to minimize the construction of new antenna towers and limit the impact on the <br />public health, safety and welfare, which includes the aesthetic impact. The code states that <br />new antennas shall be located on City water tower sites unless the applicant shows, to the <br />reasonable satisfaction of the City, that the City water towers cannot be feasibly used from an <br />engineering standpoint. If the City water tower site is not feasible, the Code requires the <br />applicant to consider the following locations in order of priority: <br />1. On existing towers or structures within any industrial, civic -center, or business <br />district; <br />2. On new towers in any industrial civic -center, or business district; <br />3. Any existing towers or structures located within any residential district; then, <br />4. Any new towers or structures located within any residential district. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 7, 2010 <br />IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009W9-023 Refiling Tower Zoning and CUP Amendment (CC Tabled)W-07-10 -PC <br />Report - Refiling Tower CUP Amendment.doc Page 5 of 10 <br />